You cannot even attempt to defy or challenge it. This is the epitome of unfalsifiable claims.

Islam apologists claim that the miracle of the Quran is only seen in the Arabic version of the Quran. Any translation of the Quran from Arabic would not be a translation of the miracle of the Quran along with it. Also, almost all Islam apologists when asked what is it they see in the Quran that is miraculous, they say no one can make something like the Quran, and so the Quran must have been an inspiration from God to the prophet of Islam. When they are asked, has anyone ever tried to make something like the Quran and failed? They say the Arabs that were present at the time of the prophet of Islam and the appearance of the Quran have failed to come up with something that is like the Quran. What about those Arabs who came after the prophet of Islam’s time? They can’t judge such a thing because they are not like the Arabs that were around at the time of the prophet of Islam and the revelation of the Quran.

Which means if someone came with something that is even more miraculous or better than the Quran in Arabic but this individual has come up with it a hundred years after the appearance of the Quran, then the Arabs at this time or at their time will not be considered as good at Arabic as those who were around in Arabia at the time of the appearance of the Quran enough to judge whether whatever that is actually better than the Quran in every way in Arabic is actually better than the Quran or more miraculous than the Quran in any way, no matter who they are.

So Muslims believe Islam is a true religion that came from a real God because no one came up with something that matches the beauty or how miraculous the Quran in Arabic is since the time of the prophet of Islam until one or two hundred years after that. And anyone who actually does come up with something that matches or even tops the beauty of the Quran or how miraculous the Quran in Arabic is but only came up with it at any time after the time of the prophet of Islam and the appearance of the Quran by more than two hundred years or so will never be considered to have come up with something that is better than or at least a match to the Quran in any way, because the Arabs that are good enough at the Arabic language like that Arabic language of the Quran are not around anymore to judge whether this text that came up challenging the beauty of the Quran is actually matching the beauty and how miraculous the Quran in Arabic is or not, or even better or not, because Arabs since two hundred years after the appearance of the Quran and after the time of the prophet of Islam are not good enough at the Arabic language as those Arabs who were alive or around at the time of the prophet of Islam and at the first fifty or one hundred years since the first appearance of the Quran.

In other words, we’re stuck with it because we will never qualify to understand why whatever that we will ever come up with will pale in comparison to the beauty and miracle of the Quran, no matter what it is or what we do. There’s no escape. We can’t win. We have to obey, or else. Don’t think about it too much.

Almost all Muslims claim that the miracle of the Quran is only seen in the Arabic version of the Quran. Any translation of the Quran from Arabic would not be a translation of the miracle of the Quran along with it. Also, almost all Muslims when asked what is it they see in the Quran that is miraculous, they say no one can say something like the Quran that the prophet of Islam has said, and so the Quran must have been an inspiration from a god to the prophet of Islam. When they are asked, has anyone ever tried to say something like the Quran and failed? They say the Arabs (that were present at the time of the prophet of Islam and the appearance of the Quran) must have failed to come up with something that is like the Quran in any way. What about those Arabs who came after the prophet of Islam’s time? They can’t judge such a thing because they are not like the Arabs that were around at the time of the prophet of Islam and the revelation of the Quran, which means if someone came with something that is even more miraculous or better than the Quran in Arabic but this one has come with it a hundred years after the appearance of the Quran, then the Arabs at this time are not as good in Arabic as those who were around in Arabia at the time of the appearance of the Quran enough to judge whether whatever that is actually better than the Quran in every way (in Arabic) is actually better than the Quran or more miraculous than the Quran in any way, no matter who they are. So Muslims believe Islam is a true religion that came from a real god because no one came up with something that matches the beauty or how miraculous the Quran in Arabic is at the time of the prophet of Islam until one hundred years or two hundred years after the time of the prophet of Islam and after the first appearance of any verse of the Quran, and anyone who actually does come up with something that matches or even tops the beauty of the Quran or how miraculous the Quran in Arabic is but came with it any time between after the time of the prophet of Islam and the appearance of the Quran by more than two hundred years and judgment day will never be considered to be better than the Quran or a match to the Quran or a match of the Quran in any way because the Arabs that are good enough in the Arabic language like that Arabic language of the Quran are not around anymore to judge whether this text that came up challenging the beauty of the Quran is actually matching the beauty and how miraculous the Quran in Arabic is or not, because Arabs since two hundred years after the appearance of the Quran and after the time of the prophet of Islam are not good enough in the Arabic language as those Arabs who existed at the time of the prophet of Islam and at the first fifty or one hundred years since the first appearance of the Quran.

We cannot afford to put restrictions on speech, even if what we’re restricting is bad.

If we stop anything because it is hate speech then we are stopping any speech, because any speech could be regarded as hate speech if looked upon from a certain point of view. You can always justify why you believe some speech is hate, you can always find a way to make anything that anyone says look like hate speech, and you can always get away with it, and find countless other people who agree with you about such views. If we stop making people say what they want because someone else might get or be offended or because someone else might consider what these people are saying to be hate speech, then we will never have freedom of speech. We have to be allowed to speak freely about anything. Placing any restrictions on what we say because it might offend someone, because of political correctness, or because of fear of saying something that could be considered as hate speech or is actually hate speech, will only annihilate our right to freedom of speech gradually until there’s nothing left of it. If we start saying people are free to say what they want with only a few exceptions, then you are not free to say what you want. Even if these exceptions to what you are allowed to say do not increase over time, still the very existence of one exception to what you can say will mean that you still do not have absolute freedom of speech.

You think that the Islamic world is just another foreign culture that is okay to be welcome in the United States or any non-Muslim majority country. The Islamic world is not the culture of the Middle East. The Islamic world is the culture of the Islamic religion. If you openly without consideration accept any anti-nationalist idea, and happily embrace anything that would make way to a global civilization where the entire planet of earth is one big city, you are only welcoming the annihilation of whatever that might lead to your dreams of a global advanced civilization being fulfilled.

There is a big difference between freedom of thought and freedom of action. We have to criticize bad ideas. But we have to stop bad actions from criminals and terrorists from happening. It is the right of anyone to believe anything that is wrong or false or incorrect, but it is not the right of anyone to force a belief upon anyone as well. They are free to believe in bad and harmful ideas. Even if these ideas are not okay or not right or not correct or not true. But we are not allowed to force them against their own will through – for example – violence and law enforcement to stop believing in such ideas, we only combat such belief in such ideas through verbal criticism that is not indoctrination and not brain washing and not harmful and not intended to force them to leave or abandon their bad ideas, and not forced upon them to listen to even if they don’t want to (like making someone forced to listen to the criticism and why what he or she believes in is wrong even if this person does not want to listen to any of that criticism or that explanation of why someone else believes that what he believes is wrong or incorrect or false) (and yes there is such a thing as verbal abuse that may be even more harmful than physical abuse and bullying by means of law enforcement forces and non-violent non-law enforcement people). If someone believes that water boils at 110 degrees Celsius, that is unacceptable, but it is still his or her right to believe in such nonsense. This one also has the right to spread those ideas and indoctrinate other innocent or ignorant people into believing in such ideas and beliefs in order to increase the number of people who believe that the boiling point of pure water is 110 degrees Celsius. This is his or her right. What is against human rights is that we force them against their will to accept the fact that the boiling point of water is 100 degrees Celsius. That is unacceptable. You are allowed to believe what you want whether you keep it to yourself or you start spreading those ideas. And if you attempted to indoctrinate or manipulate or abuse others into believing in those bad or wrong or incorrect or false ideas then you are making something that is wrong but still you have the right to do such thing because you are free to believe what you want and say what you want, and you are not to be denied from making such an action because it has harmful consequences that include even the annihilation of the possibility of the existence of such a thing as freedom of speech. But no one is allowed to make anyone stop believing in such wrong or bad or incorrect or false ideas or beliefs or things by means of forcing those who believe in such wrong or bad or incorrect or false ideas or beliefs or things to stop that against their will. Nevertheless, we still have the right to expose such nonsense and say why this thing or belief is wrong or incorrect or false, and criticize anything all we want, because we have the right to freedom of speech. We should be able to criticize stuff, just because we can. There is no such thing as people are offended by what you say. If they are offended then they should not listen to what they don’t like to listen to. They have the right to privacy, and to be alone, and to listen to no one criticizing them, but they do not have the right to prevent others from criticizing their beliefs or even criticizing them. They have the right to privacy and to be somewhere where they are alone and no one can force anything on them. They can exist in places where no criticism can reach them or be known or perceived by them in any way. But they do not have the right to say that what someone else is saying is offending them and thus this someone else should stop saying what he or she is saying because this is hate speech. If we stop anything because it is hate speech then we are stopping any speech, because any speech could be regarded as hate speech if looked upon from a certain point of view. You can always justify why you believe some speech is hate, you can always find a way to make anything that anyone says look like hate speech, and you can always get away with it, and have countless people who agree with you on this trash. If we stop making people say what they want because someone else might be offended or because someone else might consider what these people are saying to be hate speech, then we will never have freedom of speech. We have to be allowed to speak freely on any matter. Putting restrictions on what we say because someone else is offended or because of political correctness or because of fear of saying something that could be considered as hate speech or is actually hate speech will only annihilate our right to freedom of speech. If we start saying you are free to say what you want except a few things, then you are not free to say what you want. Even if these exceptions to what you are allowed to say do not increase over time, still the very existence of one exception to what you can say will mean that you do not have freedom of speech.

Yes Muslims try to mislead people into believing their religion is good through propaganda and manipulation of public opinion, yes they say stuff that they totally do not believe in, and yes they say things that they know the Islamic religion doesn’t say but they will say it anyway because it helps spread Islam and it makes Islam appeal to non-Muslims and it makes Islam look different from what it really is and it makes people believe there is nothing wrong with Islam and it is only what some people who claim to be Muslims believe Islam to be while the real Islam is nothing like what these bad people do in the name of Islam. Muslims would say anything to make Islam spread more and make the number of Muslim people increase. In Islam it is okay to do or say anything in order to make non-Muslims become Muslims and in order to convert more non-Muslims to Islam and in order to make Islam spread more and in order to make Islam dominate the world and in order to make the number of Muslims increase. You can argue that it is not Muslims fault. And you can say that Muslims are not evil. But you cannot say that this is not the fault of the Islamic Religion or the Quran of the Islamic religion or the Hadith of the Islamic religion. This is regardless of whether or not Muslims are like that. This is regardless of whether or not Muslims follow their religion. This is regardless of whether or not there are good and nice Muslim people. This is an attitude that the only cause of which is following the Islamic religion. You can say that the person who is following Islam isn’t bad but you cannot say that the religion that makes this good person do bad things isn’t bad. Islam is not a race. Islam is the Quran of the Islamic religion and the Hadith of the Islamic religion. This is not a human being in the first place. How could something that is not a human being become a race of human beings? This is different from saying Muslims are not one race because there are a lot of races following Islam. Because even if it happened that only one race of human beings are following Islam still this does not make Islam a race. Even if Muslims try to indoctrinate people into becoming Muslims, this does not mean that they do not have that right, because indoctrination is bad but as long as the means to this indoctrination is by speech then they are free to do it, and we – non-Muslims – are free to criticize that all we want, just as we are free to criticize Islam and the Quran of the Islamic religion and the Hadith of the Islamic religion and anything that has anything to do with the religion of Islam all we want, even for no other reason than just because we can.