It is undeniable that the suffering of any living thing is something that any god would not allow to take place for any reason. This fact is totally ignored as a proof of the non-existence of any god or deity whatsoever by religious believers not only because they believe that the divine compensation in the after life they believe in for all this suffering will be sufficient and should even be considered to be more than enough, but also because many of them actually do have a lesser susceptibility or tendency to suffer because of anything. This is not necessarily a weakness or something to criticize, but it is undeniable that it exists and explains a lot when it comes to having no problem with and even apologizing for the existence of evil and suffering in this world or in the first life and why that does not exclude the possibility of the existence of an omni-benevolent god at all, because they don’t think things are bad enough for it being necessary for them to think there’s anything wrong or evil going on either intentionally committed by god, or was allowed to take place with the full approval of god. This minimizing of the actual suffering that happens as a result of anything that takes place in this world that the religious apologists have is because of the effects of religious indoctrination on religious believers and also it is facilitating the process of their belief in any major mono-theistic religion in the first place as well, after all, they view their indifference to human suffering as a sign of strong faith. It is fact that the degree of suffering of different life forms due to the same causes of suffering is different. The indifference towards or the presence of too high tolerance to almost all forms of suffering provides religious believers with an ability to tolerate anything from a god, without ever contemplating the idea of quitting or abandoning such religion that gives excuses for all this evil and suffering. This provides religious believers with the ability to never abandon religion or god, even at the darkest of times. This is why they insist upon the notion that infidels are just a bunch of people who are angry with god, because of something that happened to them that they couldn’t withstand without giving up on their religious beliefs or god, with total disregard to the possibility of someone educating themselves out of religious belief or until religious belief no longer makes sense to them. Religious believers will really do everything in their power to minimize, dismiss, or invalidate the suffering that exists in this world, by any means necessary. No amount of ability to be motivated by seeking any kind of reward that is gratified only after a life time of delay is possible to be maintained by any human being long enough to keep tolerating all whatever religious believers believe that a god is testing them with or by making them go through, or is doing “according to his divine plan” without this human being simultaneously having no problem with the occurrence of whatever suffering that god is throwing at them or any other living organism in the first place. Dismissing the fact that religion demands its followers and believers to gaslight themselves into accepting any atrocities committed by god is without a shadow of a doubt a form of burying our heads in the sand. The more indoctrinated the religious believer is, the more likely they will accept anything from the god they believe in that would otherwise traumatize other humans enough to wake them up from the delusion of believing in a god despite this god showing them how much he doesn’t give a damn about them at all in the first place. How on earth they trust such a deity to compensate them for all the suffering they’ve been through whether in the first life or in the afterlife after that deity has clearly and amply demonstrated that he doesn’t give a wooden nickel about the suffering or the well-being of those believers or anything or anybody else whatsoever is beyond my capacity for imagination. They still claim that the evidence for god’s existence is everywhere, despite the fact that the evidence of god’s non-existence is everywhere. Religious indoctrination is so profound to the extent that it makes religious believers see the existence of god in every piece of evidence that disproves the possibility of the existence of any god or deity whatsoever. Every religious believer claims to feel the existence of god deep inside them. What they actually are feeling is nothing but their failure to explain or understand whatever that they can’t explain and understand, which they compulsively and automatically attribute to being an act of god. This gap of knowledge filled with stuff they can’t explain or understand, is very readily explained by anyone who has been indoctrinated by religion as more evidence for the existence of god. No religion out there bothered to spend any time explaining why there is a god in the first place. Instead, religion assumed that this was a no-brainer, and did not waste any substantial time in that territory. The people who have made up all religious texts in human history only wasted time explaining why their particular god or group of gods are the only true gods out there. Religion has taught its believers to dismiss anything they don’t have an explanation for yet with whatever explanation they can successfully use to stop their minds from working to find an explanation for this thing any further, even if this explanation never made any sense to them.

* it is undeniable that the suffering of any life form whatsoever could never be something that any god whatsoever would allow to exist for any reason. This fact is totally ignored as a proof of the non-existence of any god or deity whatsoever by religious believers not only because they believe that the divine compensation in the after life they believe in for all this suffering will be sufficient and should even be considered to be more than enough, but also because religious believers do have a lesser susceptibility to suffer because of anything. This lesser susceptibility to suffer because of anything that the religious believers have is because of the effects of religion on the humans and also it is a cause of why they believe in any major mono-theistic religion whatsoever in the first place as well. It is fact that the degree of suffering of different life forms due to the same causes of suffering is different. This provides religious believers with an ability to tolerate anything from a god. This provides religious believers with the ability to never say (and never want to say, not even within themselves): “that does it god, i’ve had enough of you and your bullshit for eternity!”. Religious believers really have no problem with whatever that god throws at them. No amount of ability to be motivated by seeking any reward whatsoever that is gratified only after a life time of delay is possible to be maintained by any human long enough to keep tolerating all whatever religious believers believe that a god is testing them with or is doing “according to his divine plan” without this human having no problem with whatever that god is throwing at him or her or any other living organism that he or she believes this god has created “for a purpose god had since ever” in the first place. The more indoctrinated the religious believer is, the more likely he or she will accept anything from the god they believe in that would otherwise traumatize other humans enough to wake up from the delusion of believing in a god despite this god’s demonstration of how much he doesn’t give a damn about you or your well being or any other living organism’s well being or life or quality of life over and over again. Religious believers still claim that the evidence for god’s existence is everywhere, despite the fact that the evidence of god’s non-existence is everywhere. The religious indoctrination of religious believers is so profound to the extent that it makes religious believers see the existence of god in every piece of evidence that disproves the possibility of the existence of any god or deity whatsoever. Every religious believer claims to feel the existence of god deep inside them. What they actually are feeling is nothing but their failure to explain or understand whatever that they can’t explain and understand, which they involuntarily attribute to god as a result of their religious indoctrination. This void filled with stuff they can’t explain and understand religious believers collectively call it “god’s doing”. Religious believers simply can’t leave anything they don’t have an explanation for yet without dismissing this thing with whatever explanation they can successfully use to stop their minds from working to find an explanation of this thing any further with or because of, even if this explanation never makes sense to them (to the religious believers themselves).

If a god has created the currently existing universe, and the universe wasn’t created to exist forever, then why didn’t this god create this currently existing universe earlier? If this god is omniscient then why did this god delay the creation of the universe despite the delay having no consequence on anything that has anything to do with this current universe? If god already knows how to create the universe, then why didn’t god create this currently existing universe any earlier than god already did so that this currently existing universe is something that has already existed in the past while humans are now all either in heavens or in hell? And if a god has created the currently existing universe for reasons this god needed, then why didn’t this god attempt to satisfy his needs earlier if god is omniscient and omnipotent and is the same as he is since ever? And if a god has created the currently existing universe for reasons that this god doesn’t need or require (and for reasons that has nothing to do with god’s needs, but only for reasons that has anything to do with god’s unneeded wants), then why didn’t this god do what he wanted to do any earlier, so that this god has done all that he wants already? And if what god wants is never ending, then that is a need and not a want, and if a god needs something then this god is not a god, because this god that is claimed to have created the universe is described by all major theistic religious texts to be self-satisfying and to be having no needs at all whatsoever, whereas all other than god need god. And if this god has been existing since ever (and if this god has no beginning), then what has this god been doing before this god created the universe? And if this god has been existing since ever (and if this god has no beginning), and if this same god has created the universe for reasons this god has, whether this god has told those whom he has created about all these reasons or has not, then either these reasons existed since ever, but god didn’t know these reasons since ever, and so god attempted to create the universe only after these reasons were known to god, which means god is not omniscient, or these reasons didn’t exist since ever, but existed later on, and as soon as these reasons that god created the universe because of them have come to existence, god has created the universe, but this also means that this god is not omniscient and omnipotent at the same time, because if this god was omniscient then this god would have known these reasons that this god will want to or have to create the universe because of before these reasons come to existence by an infinite duration of time, and consequently this god would have created this currently existing universe since ever, because god doesn’t have to create the universe after the reasons for creating the universe existed, because this god already knows these reasons before these reasons have come to exist, and so why didn’t god create the universe before these reasons that this god has always known he has to create the currently existing universe because of have come to exist? If because this god didn’t know these reasons that this god has to create the currently existing universe because of before these reasons occurred or happened or have come to exist, then this god is not omniscient. And if this god has always known (since ever) these reasons that this god has (or had) to create the currently existing universe because of before any of these reasons has occurred, has happened, or has come to exist, then why didn’t this all-knowing god create this currently existing universe any earlier? Why did this god do nothing to answer the reasons because of which this god had to create the currently existing universe until the reasons for creating the currently existing universe have all occurred, happened, or existed already? If because this god’s anticipation of these reasons doesn’t mean that this god has to answer these reasons or deal with these reasons any time earlier than the actual happening or occurrence or existence of these reasons, then this means that either these reasons are out of god’s will and are out of god’s control, and so this god couldn’t make these reasons exist any earlier than they have actually existed or any earlier than they actually will exist, which means this god is not omnipotent, or this means that these reasons could have been made to exist earlier by this omnipotent god, so that god doesn’t have to answer and deal with these reasons that god had to create the currently existing universe because of later on or in the future (but instead god will deal with these reasons since ever (or during an infinite duration of time before the moment of time that this god has actually finished creating the currently existing universe)), because god made these reasons exist since ever as well through god’s omnipotence, and so god will in this case would have created the currently existing universe as soon as these reasons that god had to (or wanted to) create the currently existing universe because of have all come to exist, which is since ever, and that counters the argument that god created the universe not since ever because the reasons that god wanted to create the universe because of didn’t exist since ever. So this god have not created the currently existing universe since ever, despite god’s ability to create the reasons that god had to (or wanted to) create the currently existing universe because of since ever, through god’s omnipotence. In addition, the currently existing universe can’t have been created since ever because the currently existing universe has not been made to be eternal, and despite this the currently existing universe is still existing, and this means that the currently existing universe hasn’t been created since ever, and if god can’t create the reasons that god wanted to create the currently existing universe because of since ever, then god is not omnipotent. Which means that whatever any major theistic religion believes is a god can’t be a god at all in the first place. And if this god could have created the currently existing universe since ever, but god didn’t, despite the absence of any acceptable reason whatsoever for god’s not creating the currently existing universe since ever, then this entity called god doesn’t exist in the first place, and therefore there is no god. Why is the currently existing universe still existing although god does not intend to make it eternal? The currently existing universe couldn’t still be existing if this currently existing universe has been created since ever, because god did not want the currently existing universe to be forever because god wants only the afterlife to be forever, and so if this currently existing universe is still existing then this currently existing universe hasn’t been created since ever, and if god has known all the reasons that this god would have to create the currently existing universe because of (since ever and for an infinite duration of time) before any of these reasons existed at all, and god could make these reasons that this god had to create the currently existing universe because of occur or happen or exist earlier and since ever and for an infinite duration of time before the existence of the currently existing universe (or before this god has created the currently existing universe), then why didn’t god do that! (Then why this god didn’t create the currently existing universe since ever?) (and if this god did create the currently existing universe since ever, the currently existing universe can’t still be currently existing because the currently existing universe wasn’t created to be eternal and so it couldn’t have been created since ever).

Because the sooner god does what he wants the better, and if god existed since ever and if god is god with all the characteristics of god then why would god not do what he wants as soon as possible although he can do whatever he wants since ever? (and this also means that god wants to abuse his creatures for what he (god) wants and not for their (god’s creatures) own good).

“One might justifiably doubt that the social impact of an idea for good or ill is an adequate measure of its truth, especially when there are reasons being offered to think that the idea in question really is true.” – William Lane Craig, “The New Atheism and Five Arguments for God, Reasonable faith.org “.

The social impact of an idea for good or ill is an adequate measure of its truth if this idea is claimed to be of divine origin, because as major theistic religions claim, god never makes any mistakes or does anything wrong. Also god is claimed to be perfect and to be pure good. Whatever evil things god allows to happen or god does directly is supposed to be considered not bad or evil from a certain point of view, because god has reasons to justify how this evil thing will lead to whatever good that god intended to happen. It is often claimed or believed that this way is presumably the only way possible, that god has to resort to in order to bring whatever good that god intends to bring to the world he created to existence. And if this is the case then the result of that seemingly evil must be good. If no good resulted after all this seemingly evil or wrong actions done by god or by religious people in the name of god, then it is true that these things that are believed to be not wrong, bad, or evil by religion are all wrong, bad, or evil things, and these things and also the methods practiced by God in order to reach them only result in negative outcomes, impacts, results, and effects. An idea that is made to lead to the good of humanity without harming or having any negative effect on humanity, is true as long as it leads to the good of humanity only, without resulting in any harm or having any negative effect, outcome, impact, or result on humanity, but if this same idea that is made to lead to the good of humanity also leads to the opposite of the good of humanity by any degree, shape, or form, then this idea or thing is harmful and bad, and cannot be infallible or of divine origin. One might argue that religion states that it is impossible to fulfill some good deeds without doing some bad or harmful things in the process, which was used in many situations in the Quran, including justifying the never-ending war declared by Islam against any non-Islamic territory that is not already occupied by Islam that exists on earth until the Islamic empire successfully occupies and rules all the world, and converts all people to Islam, because only through war would the good of Islam will prevail. This argument is invalid because life (this current or first life in this universe, which is the life before the afterlife in major theistic religions), is the most valuable thing that ever existed, including the life and the quality of life of any human being, but according to religion, life and the quality of life both are of zero value (to both god and to the humans who follow and believe in any of the major theistic religions), and life and the quality of life are both worthless, and the first life that is before the afterlife is only a means to a better after life, and thus it is worthless to god, it doesn’t matter to god, and it is of no significance to god. Which makes the occurrence of all the evil that happens to any human being unacceptable. What matters to God is what’s good for humanity in the afterlife, and so whatever that happens in the first life doesn’t matter, because the entirety of the first life is but a means to reach whatever God has prepared for humanity in the afterlife. What is described as good for humans in religion is bad for humans. But it is considered to be good because it leads to what these major theistic religions are made for, which is not the well-being of humans and is not what is good for humans in the first life that is before the afterlife, but is the well-being and what’s good for humans in the afterlife only, regardless of what negative effects would result because of that during the first life. In case there’s no afterlife, almost the entirety of what religion claims to be good for humanity is pure evil, suffering, and harm. It is impossible to imagine that a god that can create all this and also simultaneously does not value any of this, to be possible to exist. This universe and all that this universe contains is infinitely more valuable than any heavens or afterlife described in any religion could ever be. The social impact of an idea if happened to be that bad, and this idea happened to be from an all-knowing god, then either this idea is not from god or this god is not all-knowing.

If God can exist without having been created, so could matter and energy, with disregard to the currently existing universe needing to be created from scratch or not.

Why you cannot assume that the big bang is evidence for the existence of God.

Matter and energy may have always existed. Matter and energy may be eternal. If the universe had a beginning, this does not necessarily mean that matter and energy also had a beginning, because assuming the universe began with the big bang, this still does not necessarily mean that matter and energy began with the big bang. Assuming that the current universe began with the big bang, there’s still nothing in this assumption that indicates that matter and energy also came to existence or started to exist since the big bang as well. Just as religion claims that there is a god that is eternal and that has always been existing, there is nothing that makes the belief that matter and energy have always been existing, that matter and energy are eternal, or that matter and energy will always exist forever impossible to be true. The same lack of reluctance to have a problem with the idea that god is eternal, that god has always been existing, and that god will always exist forever, as proposed by religion, is supposed to make anybody that has that same kind of lack of reluctance mentioned above also have no problem with the fact that it is possible for matter and energy to be eternal, to have always existed, to have been existing since ever, or to be able to continue on existing forever. If for some reason you have a problem with that when it comes to matter and energy, you are supposed to have a problem with that when it comes to God as well.

Just as God could have existed without having been created, the universe could have existed without having been created as well. If god doesn’t require a creator to come to existence, then the universe also could come to existence without requiring a creator. Why would someone believe that God is the only exception there is from the inability or the impossibility of anything whatsoever to come to existence without a creator or without having been created?

There’s nothing that indicates that matter and energy existed at some point where before that there was no matter or energy whatsoever. There’s nothing that indicates that at some point in time there was no matter or energy at all, and then suddenly afterwards matter and energy started existing abundantly in a manner that cannot be explained except by assuming they must have been created or brought into existence by a supernatural being. If the big bang is the beginning of life on earth as we know it, whether directly, or indirectly, and since that was an event that took place at some point in time, then it is safe to assume that there was no life on earth or that there was no earth in the first place before that event (the big bang). One could claim that such event was initiated or created by the supposed God they believe in, but this would inevitably lead them to admitting that this God is responsible for creating life on earth or the universe as we know it only, not necessarily creating everything that has ever existed before that from scratch or from nothing as well. Anything that preceded such an event (the big bang), would not necessarily need to have been created by a supernatural being like a God, because you have no evidence that whatever that existed before such an event – the big bang – needed a creator, that is, couldn’t come to existence or is impossible to come to existence without having been created by a single entity or multiple entities that are totally external to it, distinct from it, and not part of it, because none of what could’ve existed before the big bang event, or whatever event you assume was the beginning of the currently existing universe or life as we know it, appeared out of nowhere suddenly, or came to existence suddenly, or in no time, and thus must have been created by an external supernatural entity, or multiple external supernatural entities, and couldn’t have existed or have been existing since ever (like God), or gradually came into existence throughout a prolonged period of time (like evolution). You have no evidence for any of the above. You only claim that since everything began by a big bang, therefore God must have been the one who put things in place in order for that big bang to take place. In other words, God must have been the one who has created the big bang, as if nothing before the big bang existed or could ever exist, or could have ever existed, and as if the inevitability of explaining the occurrence of an event like the big bang by assuming it must have been set in motion by a creator of the universe means beyond the shadow of a doubt that nothing can exist before the big bang, or whatever that existed before the big bang must also be or have been created by a God.

Matter and energy may have always existed. Matter and energy may be eternal. The universe must have had a beginning, but not matter and energy, because the beginning of the universe is the big bang, but the big bang is not the beginning of matter and energy, and the big bang only started the current universe, and the big bang did not start the existence of matter and energy. Just as the major theistic religions claim that there is a god that is eternal and that has always been existing (or has existed since ever), there is nothing that makes the belief that matter and energy have always been existing (or have existed since ever) and that matter and energy are eternal and that matter and energy will always exist forever impossible to be right or correct or true. The same defense used by major theistic religions and anyone who believes and follows any major theistic religion to hold their belief that god is eternal and that god has always been existing (or has existed since ever) and that god will always exist forever could also be used to support the possibility of matter and energy being eternal and having always been existing and having been existing since ever and existing forever.

Just as God could have existed without being created, the universe could have existed without having been created. If god doesn’t require a creator to come to existence, then the universe also could come to existence without requiring a creator deity. Why would they believe that God is the only exception from the inability of something to come to existence without a creator?

 

Whatever that you use as proof that your own religion is the one true religion disproves your claims about your own religion along with any other religion that could ever exist.

According to the Quran, Islam is the only true theistic religion. The Quran mentions that Islam is made for all time, and that Islam in and of itself renders all other previous divine religious texts and theistic religions obsolete. According to the Quran, all non-Muslims are considered infidels and are to be tortured by God in hell for eternity, and they will never be forgiven or taken out of this eternal torture in hell for any reason or at any point in time later on, whether these non-Muslims are Jews, Christians, following or believing in any religion other than Islam, agnostic, or atheists. According to Islam, all of the above or all of these categories mentioned earlier are sentenced to torture in hell for eternity alike, without redemption, without the luxury of any further appeal, and without this ever being subject to reconsideration or change by God for any reason, and whether those non-Muslims were against Islam in any way, opposed Islam by any degree, were in favor of Islam, liked Islam and Muslims and treated them nicely, never harmed or threatened the existence of Islam itself or the spread of Islam, or never worsened or attacked the image of Islam or affected how much Islam appeals to non-Muslims, and even if these non-Muslims never harmed, endangered, or threatened any Muslim, and even if these non-Muslims totally believe in god beyond the shadow of a doubt. A lot of people who misrepresent or misinterpret Islam and who claim to be religious moderates whether Muslim moderates or Non-Muslim moderate religious believers claim that this is not indicated in Islam and should be considered as a misinterpretation or misrepresentation of the Quran, or only a radical or an extremist version of Islam, but the evidence of all of the above being factual is abundant and more than enough in the Quran itself. It is literally all over the place in the Quran, without being indirect or subject to being considered metaphoric, or having the potential to be understood otherwise or in any other way. And there’s nothing in the hadith that indicates otherwise or contradicts with any of the above.

It is still, however, possible to experience whatever feelings, spirituality, and faith as a result of practicing religious prayer despite not being Muslim. Why would God give those feelings and effects of religious prayer to someone who he will later condemn to an eternity of hell?

These spiritual states should be exclusive to Muslims in this case. Only Muslims should be able to have those religious or spiritual experiences. Especially those who lead you to assume certainty about Islam being the only one true religion from God there is or currently present or available to humanity.

Why would any Christian feel bad in a special way after committing anything that is considered to be sinful, immoral, bad, forbidden, or wrong in Christianity, that is identical to how bad Muslims feel for example because of or after committing something that is considered to be of the same magnitude of how sinful, immoral, bad, forbidden, or wrong it is according to their own religion Islam, while feel virtually nothing after committing sins or crimes that are considered insanely sinful and an atrocity according to the standards set by Islam, but are not considered to be forbidden, bad, immoral, sinful, or wrong under Christianity. For example, drinking wine or lending money with interest. Simultaneously, both religions claim that the only reason you don’t feel bad after sin is because you don’t believe in God. They both seem to have no problem with considering your inability to feel bad after committing any religious sin to be due to you being an infidel or a religious non-believer, although according to Islam and Christianity, both members of the other religion and those who don’t believe in either Christianity or Islam are equally infidel or non-believers who will be sentenced to hell for eternity by God. To them, it doesn’t matter where you came from. All that matters is whether you believe in their own one true religion or not. Treatment in the first life may differ, but punishment in the afterlife would be virtually the same in both cases of Christianity and Islam. And for some reason you still believe that your certainty about the subject matter of whether or not there is a God, and that this God is certainly your own religion’s version of God, through relying solely on how certain and how strongly you feel about what you believe is somehow still reliable evidence for such a colossal claim.

Even Muslims who believe that something is not a sin do not feel bad when they do or commit it. Whilst other Muslims who believe that this same thing is a sin, (because of their differences in interpretation, understanding, or views of what is to be considered right or wrong in their own version of religion, in this instance, Islam), feel bad and guilty when they do this same thing or commit this same act. And if these same Muslims doubt the existence of God or question any of his teachings, commandments, or will concerning anything that happens in this world, they might end up feeling way worse than they could ever feel because of or after doing or committing anything that is forbidden under Islam that is considered to be of less magnitude in terms of sin than the sin of infidelity or disbelief in god, including how guilty they feel afterwards all the time because of what they did.

Islam for example, claims that all such negative feelings including the guilt and remorse, are all some form of punishment by god to the sinful.

If that was true then any Christian would never feel bad when they do something they believe to be forbidden or considered to be sinful according to Christianity, just because they are not Muslim, and thus are lost or doomed anyway no matter what they do or don’t do.

What about feeling good after they, despite being Christian, repent? How could any Christian feel good after they repent, if the claims made by Islam were true?

How about the way a Christian feels after believing that God has answered their prayers?

Moreover, Christians pray and see, or at least think, that their prayers have been answered by God, despite Islam making the claim that God does not answer prayers from religious non-believers, or from anyone who is not Muslim, no matter how hard they try. 

This is impossible to take place unless whatever that makes any Christian believe their prayers have been answered by God is the same that makes any Muslim believe their prayers have been answered by God as well. In other words, a false fixed belief, a delusion.

One need only believe in a supernatural deity residing in the sky that answers prayers and controls everything there is in order to feel any of the above emotional certainties that are perpetually used by religious believers to justify their positions toward religion. After the above demonstration, it should be clear to you that whatever feelings, spiritual or otherwise, including changes in mood, not to mention any form of invisible connection or communication you might have with God is all but a delusion, that only feels true because you profoundly believe in it. 

At least the fact that any of these feelings seem to be identical no matter which religion you believe in should indicate that your certainty about your own religion or version of religion to be the one true religion from the one and only true creator of the universe should be questioned, or should at least not remain so intact, not to mention totally nullified. At least your spiritual claims and beliefs shouldn’t remain that certain, or shouldn’t retain that much certainty from now on. And that it is very likely to be based upon something that exists because you were severely indoctrinated at some point in your lifetime prior to no longer feeling the necessity of exercising doubt or skepticism upon anything unless it falls under the category of politics or the government.

According to Islam (the Quran) only Muslims are on the right major theistic religion since the appearance of Islam and the beginning of the prophecy of the Islamic only and final (last) prophet, and the mentioning of the Quran that Islam is made for all time till judgment day and that god made Islam to dominate all other previous divine religious texts and all other major and minor theistic religions is not the reason why the single Islamic prophet is the final prophet, because there could be more prophets that come after him later on that are also Islamic and provide some kind of refreshment for Islam as a religion without providing a whole (brand) new religion like what Christianity has done to the Jewish religion. The distinction between both is that Islam in the Quran makes a distinction between a religious messenger from god, and a prophet follower of the last religion’s messenger or the major theistic religion that the last messenger from god so far has come with or has delivered to humanity from god. These prophets as Islamic texts explain are just rulers with the religion according to the current situations, they are like the court of law that uses existing law and applies it correctly to the variable occurring new situations, and what makes those prophets not just people who know and apply religion correctly on the new era of humanity is their being special because of their being chosen by god to be directly inspired by god in whatever they say or do or know, or in other words, god directly communicates verbally with those prophets, regardless of their religion, and tells them the divine words of truth about anything and everything, whether through angels like arch angel Gabriel or through dreams or directly through making those prophets receive gods words without the word of god being delivered to them through any medium and while they are wide awake, and they don’t just receive the word of god in actual words but they receive the meanings and then they may express them in their own words later on if they intend to teach these meanings delivered to them from god or inspired to them by god to someone else, it is like god directly inspires them with the content that god wants them to know in the form of meaning and understanding instead of words which these prophets may misinterpret because they just receive the words of god from god without god explaining to them everything about god’s teachings and inspirations, so god gives them the understanding and meanings instead of just words, and this is another difference between prophets and non-prophets in Islamic texts. According to Islamic texts, only prophets receive meanings and understandings directly from god and not just words that they attempt to understand after listening to them. And according to Islamic texts also prophets are different from messengers only in that messengers have an obligation from god to spread what they have learnt (without holding anything back for themselves or because people may misunderstand it at that time) to the entire group of people or region or race they have been sent to, while prophets do not necessarily have that obligation from god to teach anyone else what god inspires them with, no matter what, except if these prophets are at the same time messengers. According to Islamic texts, a prophet may or may not be simultaneously a messenger from god to humanity, but a messenger from god is definitely a prophet from god as well, as long as this messenger is human (and not an angel or non-human being). When Islamic texts indicate literally that there is no prophet or messenger ever after the single and only first and last prophet of Islam who gave the Muslims the whole and only version of Quran, this is not the proof why Islam is made for all humanity and for all time until the judgment day, but the proof of why Islam was made for all humanity and for all places on earth and for all time on earth until the judgment day, {which is the end for the validity of Islam not because it will be replaced by another religion but because the Quran indicates literally that whomever believes in Islam (to be the only right religion since Islam has appeared) and the Islamic single and only and first and last prophet after admitting that the judgment day is inevitably true because of signs that indicate the impossibility of the judgment day not being true has come to existence and has become observable to all humans on earth his belief in god and Islam and the Islamic prophet will then be too late to be accepted by god and he will still be considered infidel, even if he believed in god through the Christian religion or the Jewish religion or through believing and/or following any major theistic religion other than Islam (the full Islamic major theistic religion that the Quran has come with and not just what prophets before Islam were all considered Muslims because of, even (or including) the prophet Ibrahim or Abraham),} according to Islamic texts and as indicated literally by the Quran is in Islam being the final religion made by god and that god has made that final religion (Islam) to be for all time and for all humanity to follow and for all places on earth, and god in the Quran literally says that he (god himself) has replaced all other previous major and minor theistic religions with his final version of divine theistic religion of Islam in the Quran and the words of the Islamic prophet that are not Quran themselves, and not just as an optional replacement, or an optional upgraded version of any major theistic religion ever, but as an obligatory replacement of all major and minor theistic religions of all time, that if not followed, would make the non-follower of this replacement religion – the Islam – an infidel that god would sentence to be tortured in hell for eternity, no matter what, and no matter how good this human was and no matter what the major theistic religion that this human was following all his life was (or is), as long as this human was not Muslim, no matter what, this human would be considered by god to be the worst ever of humans, if this human was not a Muslim, if this human existed at any moment of time after the declaration of Islam and the prophecy of the single and only Islamic prophet has appeared and reached him (the message of having to be a Muslim has reached this human), and this human is considered by god an infidel that is sentenced to be tortured in hell for eternity no matter what even if this human never opposed Islam and was never against Islam or any Muslim whatsoever, and never battled against Islam or any Muslim whatsoever, and never did anything that could harm Islam or Muslims in any way ever and never did anything that could affect the continued existence of Islam or the continued or started spreading of Islam or the appeal of Islam to any Muslim or non-Muslims or any other human whatsoever anywhere on earth at any time ever, if this human was from or of or following any major theistic religion whatsoever (even Christianity and Jewish religions) just because this human is not Muslim, and according to Islamic texts and the Quran no individual can be Muslim and also Christian at the same time or Muslim and Jewish simultaneously, as Islam and any other religion are mutually exclusive, and one cannot be Muslim while being or believing in or following any other major or minor theistic religion other than Islam or believing that any other major or minor theistic religion is valid or okay to be followed currently after the appearance of Islam and the knowing of this individual of Islam’s existence. This means that according to literal Islamic texts interpretation, and according to literal interpretation of the Quran and the Islamic prophet’s words that are not Quran, all those that are not Muslims that existed on earth since the Islamic religion was fully delivered from god to humanity on earth for all time and for all places and for all humans until judgment day, are considered infidels and are definitely – (and without doubt except from infidels) that all of those (that are not Muslims) – sentenced and condemned to be tortured by god (after (the) judgment day (is over)) in hell for eternity, and they will never be forgiven or taken out of this eternal torture in hell for any reason whatsoever or at any point later on ever, no matter what, whether these humans who are not Muslims are Christians or Jewish or following and believing in any major or minor theistic religion whatsoever other than Islam, or are agnostic or are atheists, all are sentenced to be tortured by god in hell for eternity alike, without redemption and without this sentence ever changing or stopping or being reconsidered by god for any reason whatsoever, no matter what, and whether these humans who are not Muslims were against Islam in any way ever or opposed Islam by any degree ever or were in favor of Islam or even liked Islam and Muslims and treated them nicely and never harmed or threatened the existence of Islam itself or the spread of Islam or worsened or attacked the image of Islam or affected the appealing of Islam to non-Muslims ever and even if these humans who are not Muslims never harmed or endangered or threatened any Muslim whatsoever (by) any degree of harm or danger or threat whatsoever, no matter what, and even if these humans who are not Muslims totally without any degree of doubt ever believed in god and judgment day and heaven and hell and that all prophets and messengers of god are not liars, no matter what. A lot of people who misrepresent Islam and who claim to be religious moderates whether Muslim moderates or Non-Muslim moderate religious believers claim that this is not indicated in Islam and should be considered as a misinterpretation of Quran and a radical and an extremist version of Islam but the evidence of that all that which has been written in this point is factual and true and correct and right in the Quran and is what the Quran literally indicates and says, and is also what the words of the single and only Islamic prophet that are not Quran indicates and says and mean, is undeniable and overwhelming, and makes these matters of no debate for Muslims and Islam like the fact that Jesus was not crucified in Islam, but the guy who was crucified wasn’t Jesus at all but he was someone else that looked like Jesus. Saying that Islam does not literally mean or indicate or state without doubt that any of the above that is written in this point is true or right or correct or fact is like saying the text and words of the Quran indicate that the Quran itself is not the word of god (or saying that the Quran itself indicates or says that the Quran itself is made by a human or someone else other than god himself) (to humanity). According to the Quran the Quran text itself is the spoken word of god, and is not the expression of the meanings that are inspired by god to the only human single Islamic prophet in the only human single Islamic prophet’s own words. And according to all of the above that is written in this point, god is never pleased with anyone who is not Muslim, and this proves that all the feelings and all the spiritual effects and faith that any human that is not Muslim gets from prayer or from this human doing or making any religious thing whatsoever is but a delusion, as god will never make anyone who is considered by god himself to be an infidel and will thereby be sentenced and condemned to be tortured in hell for eternity feel good in any way whatsoever or be better in any way whatsoever because of their religious practices or prayer or anything they do that they believe is supposed to make them go to heaven and please god and avoid going to hell without them being Muslims, no matter what. God will never make anyone who is considered by god himself to be an infidel and will thereby be sentenced and condemned to be tortured in hell for eternity be in any state whatsoever that only Muslims are supposed to be in or reach from following god’s only right religion – the Islamic religion – through any religious practice or religious thing whatsoever (including prayer) that these humans do or make or follow while these humans are not Muslims, no matter what. And at the same time god makes disobedient (people who disobey god and god’s words) Muslims and sinful Muslims themselves feel bad because of them disobeying god and because of their sins, no matter how they try to feel good or be good despite their sins as long as they are still Muslims. Even Muslims who believe that something is not a sin do not feel bad when they do it, while other Muslims who believe that this same thing is a sin (because of their difference in interpretation and understanding and views of or in the religious texts and the Quran) feel bad and guilty when they do this same thing. And if these same Muslims disbelieve in god (and become infidels) they feel that they feel even worse than they ever did because of doing anything that was forbidden in Islam but was lesser than infidelity or disbelief in god, and they have much more guilt than they have ever felt before from doing anything that is forbidden in Islam that is lesser (that is not) than infidelity and disbelief in god. According to Islam all these guilt feelings are and all this feeling bad and misery is a direct torture from god or at least directly caused by god to humans because god does this (causing of humans to feel guilty and feel bad and be miserable) to anyone who has strayed from (or has left or has abandoned or has disobeyed) the right and correct strict following of Islam and the Islamic religion and the Quran. If that was true then any Christian would never feel bad when he (this same Christian) does something he (this same Christian) believes is forbidden (or considered a sin) according to Christianity or by god (if they are good followers of Christianity and have strong faith like a Christian cardinal or a Christian pope for example) but nevertheless they do feel bad when they do or make something that they believe is forbidden (or considered a sin) by Christianity or by god although they are not Muslims, and any Christian would never feel good after he (this same Christian) apologizes to god and asks for god’s forgiveness and seeks redemption until this Christian feels that god has forgiven him and until this Christian feels redeemed by good and forgiven by god and that god has answered his prayers, but many Christians do feel good after he (this Christian) apologizes to god and asks for god’s forgiveness and seeks redemption until this Christian feels that god has forgiven him and until this Christian feels redeemed by god and forgiven by god and that god has answered his prayers although this human Christian is not Muslim. Moreover, Christians pray and see their prayers answered by god, despite god saying god will never answer prayers from those who are infidels and those who are not Muslims because those who are not Muslims are infidels and disbelievers in god, because if they believed in god they would have been Muslims only because god said god will never accept any religion from any human being whatsoever other than Islam after the completion of the delivery of Islam to humanity through the only single Islamic prophet. This is impossible to be true unless whatever that makes any Christian believe his prayers have been answered by god is the same that makes any Muslim believe his prayers have been answered by god as well, and if it is not something spiritual delivered from god directly to the non-prophet human, then it could never be anything but imagination or more precisely a delusion created by the mind of each of the Muslim human and the Christian human alike, the delusion that there is a god that exists and answers prayers from those humans who believe in god and believe in god’s ability of answering any prayer from any faithful believer in god whatsoever, no matter what. In addition, if that is the case then either all these religious feelings and spiritual effects and mood changes and invisible connections and communications with god are all a delusion, or are from god, and if these things are a delusion then they must never be used as a proof that god exists by believers even if these believers experience or feel these things almost every day, and if these things are from god (if these things that are invisible communications and spiritual connections with god are real and these feelings of guilt and feeling bad because of sins and feeling miserable because of doing or making sins or things that are forbidden in the major theistic religion that is believed in and being followed by this human or these humans are real) and are directly sent from god to humans who believe in god, then these things could never be received by anyone considered by god to be the same as any agnostic or atheist, as god will never make anyone who is considered by god himself to be an infidel or a disbeliever in god and will thereby be sentenced and condemned to be tortured in hell for eternity be in or reach or receive or get or feel any (spiritual or religious) state whatsoever that only Muslims are supposed (according to Islamic texts and the Quran and the words of the single and only Islamic prophet that are not Quran or of the Quran) to be in or reach or receive or get or feel from god from (or because of) following god’s only right religion – the Islamic religion – (while this human becomes in or reaches or receives or gets these (spiritual or religious) states) through any religious practice or religious thing whatsoever (including prayer) that this human does or makes or follows while this human is not Muslim, no matter what. And so if any human who is not Muslim becomes in or reaches or receives or gets or feels any (spiritual or religious) state whatsoever through any religious practice or religious thing whatsoever (including prayer) that this human does or makes or follows while this human is not Muslim, no matter what, then this proves that the Islamic texts and the Quran and the words of the single and only Islamic prophet that are not Quran or of the Quran contain claims that are not true or correct or right, because this proves that Christians are not infidels and Christians are not regarded by god to be like atheists and agnostics by god in judgment day and Christians will not be sentenced to be tortured in hell for eternity even if they heard everything about Islam but never became Muslims themselves unless (the only way to defend the Islamic Quran and the words of the single and only Islamic prophet that are not Quran and all religious texts and claim they are not wrong and do not contain anything wrong or not true or not correct is to admit the fact (that is true and right and correct) that) what both Christians and Muslims feel and experience of faith from god and spirituality from god and invisible spiritual connections with god and invisible spiritual direct communications with god and answering of prayer(s) from god is all but a delusion (because if all this is not from god then all this is definitely a delusion in the minds of the human believers in and/or followers of any major or minor theistic religion whatsoever no matter what) and (so is also) a lie and not true and is incorrect and is all wrong (as well), and (all) this proves that the Quran is not the word of god because the word of god (as claimed in the Quran that god himself says that god’s words) could never contain any lie or anything that is not true or correct or right whatsoever, and if the Quran is not the word of god, then the Quran is all but a lie and the Quran is all wrong and is all incorrect and is all not true, or at least (or at most) the Quran could never be anything except something made by a human being and not made by (any) god (whatsoever) or through (any god whatsoever) or because of (any god whatsoever) or as a result of god’s existence or god’s inspiration to any human being whatsoever, which either way proves Islam to not be a divine theistic religion from god at all, and only possible to be a human made religion that is not from (any) god (whatsoever) and has nothing to do with (any) god (whatsoever) at all, at least in the process of the making of anything (of the) Islamic (religion and texts), including all the Quran itself and all the words of the single and only Islamic prophet that are not Quran as well.

Whatever that can create such complex universe is bound to be even more too complex to be able to come to being on its own without needing to be created at all at any point as well.

It is often claimed that since the entire universe along with everything in it are too complex to come to existence on its own or without having been created by anyone or anything external to them that is totally separate and distinct from them and not part of any of them. This still doesn’t make it less likely to have been created by multiple entities or Gods. If something is harder to achieve, it is supposed to be rendered easier to an extent by making many entities work on it, instead of just one entity. At least in most cases. Sometimes, things become easier or better when you do them all on your own only without any external assistance or help from anybody else whatsoever. But at least this is not a case where you say this definitely was created by one God only, and cannot have been created by multiple Gods at all, no matter what.  The argument that coincidence can’t result in all this universe and all that is in the universe is countered by that the creation of the entire universe and everything in that universe the way it is, is also less likely to be done by one entity, which makes the idea that the universe and what’s in it were created by multiple entities or Gods much more likely, assuming of course, that any of the above had to be created and cannot come to existence any other way. In addition, if the universe is too difficult or complex to come to being on its own, it would still be too difficult for any single entity there is to be able to create the entire universe with everything there is that is inside this universe alone all on its own. It is way less likely that the universe with everything that’s in it were created from nothing by a single entity than any other explanation that could be proposed for the phenomena. Certainty about the assumption that it was all created from nothing by a single God only indicates that you don’t care about the truth and that you are just a part of a cult that wants to control every aspect of your and everybody else’s thinking and behavior, without having to think about anything at all ever. It is easier to believe that the entire universe and all that the entire universe contains originated on their own, came to be on their own, or were always there without having a beginning at some point than it is to assume that there’s no acceptable explanation in this scenario except attempting to believe that the entire universe and all that the entire universe contains must have been created by one entity, whether this one or single creator of the universe entity is a God, as described in any theistic religion, or anything else whatsoever. Whatever that created the too complex to come to existence on its own universe and everything there is that’s in it is bound to be even more too complex to come to existence on its own without having to be created at some point prior to its existence as well. In this case, the perpetual question remains: Who created God? 

Belief in a God to be the ultimate explanation of existence of anything and everything does not solve the problem of how things came to be. It just increases the number of things that cannot be explained whilst explaining nothing of what didn’t have an explanation before proposing such solution.

The entire universe with everything in it is too complex to come from the creation of one entity. The argument that coincidence can’t result in all this universe and all that is in the universe is countered by that the creation of the entire universe and everything in that universe the way it is is impossible to be done by one entity no matter what. And just because the universe is too difficult to originate on its own does not necessarily mean that it had to be created, because one entity (no matter what or who this entity is) can never create the entire universe with all that the universe is consisted of and all that the universe contains, no matter what. Assuming that a god must have created this universe because the universe and all that the universe contains are too difficult and complex is infinitely more unlikely than the fact that the universe and all that the universe contains originated on their own. The fact that the entire universe and all that the entire universe contains originated on their own is infinitely more likely and possible and reasonable and acceptable to be true and right and correct than the false belief that the entire universe and all that the entire universe contains must have been created by one entity, whether this one creator entity is a god (as described in any major theistic religion) or anything (else) whatsoever.