Still, proving evolution to be true confirms the fact that almost all religion on earth is false or made up. Not necessarily because evolution itself contradicts with the idea of a creator of the universe, but because of the strong claims made by religion concerning the origin of life on earth. Religion seems to contradict with the idea of evolution every step of the way. There’s no way to reconcile those two things without entirely dismissing the other as false. Evolution and religion are mutually exclusive. Any attempt of reconciliation is hypocrisy at an astronomical level.

You don’t have to prove that evolution is true to prove that any religion is false. Still, almost all religions claim that God or multiple Gods created life on earth and are responsible for everything that happens on earth. Since the theory of evolution has now been confirmed to be true beyond the shadow of a doubt, any religion that claims that God created human beings or life on earth could be easily dismissed as false, made up, or obsolete. This alone, should serve as proof enough that any religion that claims that God created life on earth is impossible to be true, no matter what.

You don’t have to prove evolution is correct, right and true to prove religion (any religion and any religious text whatsoever) is wrong, false and impossible to be true, even if the proving of the evolution theory to be correct, right, and true proves that all religions and religious texts are wrong, false and impossible to be correct as well. Of course the proving of all religions and religious texts to be wrong, false and impossible to be correct, no matter what does not necessarily mean evolution theory is right, true and correct, but at least the proving of all religions and religious texts to be wrong, false and impossible to be correct, no matter what, makes the evolution theory possible (and probable to be true, and this is in case of the theory of evolution not proved yet by hard scientific evidence to be a true, a correct and a right facts explaining theory,) to be correct, true and right.

It’s not about what you think. You think it works only because they told you so.

The fact that prayer has no effect on the occurrence of anything, should indicate that whatever you believe to be true because prayer works is absolutely false, no matter what. The ability to produce the same results with or without prayer, or whether or not prayer exists, has existed, or has taken place, is proof enough that prayer is entirely useless. With or without prayer, the outcome remains the same. With or without prayer, you will get the same results. Whether or not prayer has taken place, the result would never be, or would have never been, any different, no matter what, except for the effects that may be described as the placebo effect, or the effects of delusion, which would make the praying individual not only believe that everything that happens in favor of what the praying individual wants means that God has answered their prayers, but also the delusion and placebo effect of religious prayer sometimes makes this praying individual become actually better because the praying individual believes that they are now receiving divine aid directly from God, whether or not this is actually the case or what has actually happened.

According to how much the individual strongly believes they will reach their goals, they will be able to succeed, with or without divine intervention. You have to reach something through prayer that is impossible to be reached without prayer no matter what, or else you cannot assume that prayer makes any difference.

Aside from the power of belief and its effects on you, if anything that you receive due to prayer could still be received whether you’ve prayed or not, then prayer in and of itself changes nothing in both cases or whether or not you pray. If a factor could be removed from the equation without the equation changing, then the presence or absence of this factor does not make any difference in the equation or in the outcome.

The fact that the presence or absence of prayer by any human whatsoever has no effect on the happening or occurrence or fulfillment of anything at all whatsoever no matter what except only the effect of the power of delusion on the praying individual(s) is always noticed and understood and discovered by the genius human as a fact and a finding that is absolutely true, correct and right no matter what. In fact the power of the false and idiotic delusion of believing prayer has any effect on anything at all whatsoever has an opposite effect on the genius human because the false and idiotic delusion of believing prayer has any effect on anything at all whatsoever makes the genius human believe in something that the genius human’s brain knows with absolute certainty to be wrong, false and incorrect since ever (even since the genius human is four years old) and this has countless negative effects on the Genius Human. And so the genius human develops an unshakable belief from the start (since ever) that if the genius human wants something to happen in any particular way, the genius human must never pray for that to be fulfilled by god or with the help of god, or else it will not happen no matter what, and this is not because the genius human did not do everything that the genius human should do and can do for this thing to happen in a (certain) particular way, but because of the reasons mentioned above, despite the religious believers believing that god must have had a good reason not to help this time and god must have had a good reason for not making this thing happen in this particular way this time, for the good of this human, whether in this life or in the claimed to be true delusion of an (the) after life, because the genius human is intelligent enough to know there isn’t any reason for that. And the reasons the thing has not happened always has nothing to do with anything god is wrongly believed to be the only one that is able to cause or control, no matter what.

The ability to produce the same results with or without prayer (or whether prayer has existed or not) is proof enough that prayer is useless. And the claiming of religious texts that prayer makes things happen because of god’s interference in anything that is required to be altered or controlled or interfered in by god for anything to happen or occur or exist or be in any particular way or else it (the thing or anything) could not have happened or could not have occurred or could not have existed or could not ever be in this particular way or at least (the thing or anything) may not necessarily happen or occur or exist or be in this particular way if it weren’t for prayer is false and incorrect and absolutely and totally wrong and not true, because whether or not the prayer has taken place, the result would never be (or would never have been) any different, no matter what, except what effects that may be described as the placebo effect, or the effect of delusion, which would make the praying individual not only believe that everything that happens in favor of the fulfillment of what this praying individual is praying god to grant him is because of god and god’s doing and god’s answering this individual’s prayers, but the effect of delusion and the placebo effect of religious prayer to god also makes this praying individual become actually better because he or she (the praying individual) believes that he or she (the praying individual) is being aided directly by god, and the amount or the magnitude of how much this individual becomes temporarily better (due to this placebo effect of prayer in (or that occurs to) any non-genius human who believes in god and any major religion whatsoever) is directly proportional to how much this praying individual believes god has (totally) answered his prayers. Even in self-help, it is said that it is according to how much the individual believes he will reach his goals whether or not this individual will succeed, and the one who believes he will definitely reach any certain definite goal he has, with absolute certainty and no doubt, must succeed in reaching his goals, and in self-help it is called the power of belief, and this power of belief in self-help is considered a must have key to success, and success is considered in self-help to be impossible without this power of belief as well, and the power of total belief in the fulfillment of the individual’s goals is considered in (at least) some (or even many) of the self-help writings to be a law of success.

* If the species of every living organism was created directly by god, they would never require to have their body cells each made with DNA that is consisted from the same four basic DNA building blocks. So the DNA of all species being built from the same four basic building blocks does not necessarily mean they were all created by the same creator that is god, but on the contrary, if the DNA of all living species were created by the same creator god the DNA of every species is extremely likely to have been created from unique building blocks for each living species, because there is no reason to make the DNA of all species all from the same four building blocks whatsoever, and also for god to show the humans how god could create DNA from countless different and unique building blocks, and how creative god is, and that god could do anything in countless ways, and not just in one particular way, because the more powerful a god is, the more able he would be to do and create anything through countless unique ways, and always get the same perfect end results he could get through any of these ways from all the other unique ways as well, no matter what.

Also your acclaimed god likes variety, he didn’t just create one kind of plants or a limited small number of plant species enough to do the job of plant life on earth, but you claim that there is a god who created all these countless plant species on earth, for variety, and for why not create all those countless plant species when he could create all those countless plant species, and to show the humans who were only created to worship god (as religious texts claim) how almighty and powerful and All-knowing and creative god is, why would god not do the same – show us how creative he is by building the DNA of each and every unique species from unique building blocks totally or even slightly different from the building blocks which the DNA of each of all other living species is built from – in case of the cellular DNA of the living organisms? Is it because god can’t do so? Then god is not able to do anything and everything as religious texts claim he can. If god can do so, then why didn’t he do it? Is it because the DNA is something that would not show us – except since the twentieth century – how creative and almighty and powerful and all-knowing god is because it is concealed and requires advanced technology to even discover its existence? Then why claim that god built every living cell from DNA while he could’ve created any living cell without DNA and give it life, but god keeps to do things through a way that makes everything seem to work on its own without requiring or needing a god at all in the first place just to show us how powerful, all knowing, all mighty and creative he is? How would he do so through invisible ways or undiscoverable ways by humans? And if they claim this is to provide further proof of how powerful, creative, all knowing and almighty god is to the later generations like those since the twentieth century, (if your claim was true) then why didn’t he vary as he did in case of plants? Why didn’t god show us how almighty and great and all-knowing and all powerful and all creative he is by building the DNA of each and every unique species from unique building blocks totally or even slightly different from the building blocks which the DNA of each of all other living species is built from (in case of the cellular DNA of the living organisms) like god did in case of the vast variation of plant life instead of [(just creating one kind of plants or a limited small number of plant species enough to do the job of plant life on earth (no matter what, it is possible for all life on earth to be perfect or at least exist the way it is now in the twenty first century without all this number of different plant species on earth existing in the first place, as long as there is much plant life from any certain much less than the existent number of species of plants enough on earth for all there is on earth to be the way it is on earth in the twenty first century, god himself claims he created everything for the purpose of knowing how much powerful, all mighty, all knowing, and all creative god is, only, and not because the purpose of creation of life on earth wouldn’t be possible to be achieved or accomplished (humans worshiping god and believing in god while they live on earth till they go to heaven or hell according to what each human has done during his lifetime on earth) without all the abundance of (and existence of countless) species of living organisms that religious texts claim god have created all by himself whether the religious people believe that has been done directly or indirectly by any means whatsoever they believe in its being the way god created everything living on earth through or by (which)), but you claim that there is a god who created all these countless plant species on earth, for variety, and for why not create all those countless plant species when he could create all those countless plant species without any distress whatsoever from the creation process occurring to god no matter how difficult the creation process is (or was), and to show the humans who were only created to worship god (as religious texts claim) how almighty and all powerful and all-knowing and all creative god is)] just to show us how almighty and great and all-knowing and all powerful and all creative he (god) is? And if this was not meant to show off and impress humans or increase the ‘faith’ of humanity in god’s creativity and might, then why did god even bother to make cells contain DNA in the first place without giving the (all the) living cells of all species of living organisms the ability to reproduce with meiosis and do all that the DNA does for (or inside) the cells of the living organisms without the existence of a DNA in any living cell in the first place, through making the living cells of all species of living organisms take direction from god himself directly and be controlled miraculously by god himself directly without god being occupied by this at all for any duration of time whatsoever, and through the living cells of all species of living organisms taking orders directly from god himself instead of needing DNA to do what DNA is required by any living cell to do and make, if god doesn’t need DNA to make cells do what DNA makes the living cells able to do (if god doesn’t need or require the means of DNA to make living cells do and make whatever the DNA inside current living cells makes the living cells be capable of doing and making), no matter what, because god can do anything with or without means as religious texts claim to be true about their imaginary god?

{(Why not make cells without DNA? To show humans how he (god) is able to do anything and everything? Then why didn’t he vary the DNA building blocks in every unique living species to show us how he (god) is not limited in accomplishing any end result by only one way or method, and also to show us how all creative he (god) is like he showed us when he varied the plant species by making the number of unique plant species that vast and great? Because the DNA is concealed from humans until the DNA was possible to be discovered by humans in the twentieth century? Then why create the DNA in the first place and not run cells miraculously and directly from above without needing DNA to do and make what DNA in current living cells of all living organism species is (was) created to do and make? Because he (god) wanted to strengthen the faith of those who has lived and existed only since the discovery of cellular DNA because at that time faith would require new things to appear to strengthen it because it has been too long since god has sent a prophet to do this job (of faith renewal and strengthening) and so new things that may be misunderstood and misinterpreted by delusional believers in god or any religious text whatsoever as a proof of god must appear to those who exist after the twentieth century only? If so then why this new thing that god planned to be able to do the above described purpose is not like the above description ((then) why didn’t he vary the DNA building blocks in every unique living species to show us how he (god) is not limited in accomplishing any end result by only one way or method, and also to show us how all creative he (god) is like he showed us when he varied the plant species by making the number of unique plant species that vast and great?)? If it is not for that (which has been explained above that it is impossible not to be not for that purpose because that is what religious texts have claimed why god has done all this that is not necessarily required or essential for the purpose of creation stated above to be possible to be accomplished successfully at all. [((No matter what, it is possible for all life on earth to be perfect or at least exist the way it is now in the twenty first century without all this number of different plant species on earth existing in the first place, as long as there is much plant life from any certain much less than the existent number of species of plants enough on earth for all the life there is on earth to be the way it is on earth in the twenty first century, and god himself (in religious texts) claims he created everything for the purpose of showing humans and making humans know how much all powerful, all mighty, all knowing, and all creative god is, only, and not because the purpose of creation of life on earth wouldn’t be possible to be achieved or accomplished (each human on earth worships god and believes in god while each human is living on earth till each human goes to heaven or hell according to what each human has done during his lifetime on earth) without all the abundance of (and existence of countless) species of living organisms that religious texts claim god have created all by himself, whether the religious people believe that creation of everything by god has been done directly or indirectly by any means whatsoever they believe to be the way god created everything living on earth through or by which))]) Then why create DNA in human cells in the first place? [(Why did god even bother to make cells contain DNA in the first place without giving the (all the) living cells of all species of living organisms the ability to reproduce through meiotic division and do all that the DNA does for (or inside) the cells of the living organisms without the existence of DNA in any living cell in the first place, through making the living cells of all species of living organisms take direction from god himself directly and be controlled miraculously by god himself directly without god being occupied by this at all for any duration of time whatsoever, and through the living cells of all species of living organisms taking orders directly from god himself instead of needing DNA to do what DNA is required by any living cell to do and make, if god doesn’t need DNA to make cells do what DNA makes the living cells able to do (if god doesn’t need or require the means of DNA to make living cells do and make whatever the DNA inside current living cells makes the living cells be capable of doing and making), no matter what, because god can do anything with or without means as religious texts claim to be true about their imaginary god?)].)}.

Religious texts claim that god created everything directly by himself. Which contradicts with evolution of species from one another as the origin of all living organisms on earth now even if they all evolved from a unicellular organism which was created, the way religious texts express how god created everything is impossible to be interpreted in a way that does not contradict with this. When god says in religious texts that he designed and formed and created by coming down or heading to earth to create every living organism species as exactly as they were at the time the last religious texts appeared, this is impossible to mean he created the initial simple life forms only and the DNA and every living organism species came after that by themselves through evolutionary ways that took place during billions or millions of years afterwards and not at the time during which god descended to earth to create life on earth and create earth itself as well before that immediately.

Also the way that god was described as the creator of earth itself looks like god didn’t create anything else of comparison to earth in the entire existence other than heaven and hell and angels and invisible creatures to humans like demons. The way stars are described as being created to make the sky look beautiful if looked upon from earth and also to provide direction to those who are lost in deserts and darkness means that the one who is speaking about stars doesn’t know that each star in the sky is like our sun of the solar system, and that the sun is just an ordinary sun among all other suns in the universe, which are totally not described as being not any less miraculous than the sun of our solar system itself, but instead described as shining dots in the sky and that is all the miracle in them. And all the focus on how miraculous and amazingly great and mighty and miraculous and balanced our solar system sun is and the moon of the earth is as if there is no other sun ever created by this one (god) who is speaking through religious texts ever, or any other moon as well. God didn’t even bother to mention that this amazing sun of our solar system he created is just another sun out of countless suns he created in countless other star systems in the universe he claims to have created. It is too obvious to notice that the one who is speaking in all religious texts without exception has no idea about our recent discoveries about the universe, and has no idea about anything in the universe or anything that has anything to do with our universe structure and cosmology other than that which is visible by the naked eye of the humans on earth only.

“There is not a single line in the bible or the Quran that could not have been authored by a first century person. There is nothing about electricity, there is nothing about DNA. There is nothing about the principles of infectious disease. There is nothing particularly useful. There is a lot of Iron Age barbarism and superstition. This is not a candidate book. I can go to any Barnes and Noble blindfolded and pull a book of a shelf which is going to have more relevance, more wisdom for the 21^st century than the bible or the Quran. It’s really not an exaggeration. Every one of our specific sciences has superseded and surpassed the wisdom of scripture.” – Sam Harris.

How noah has put all the creatures that did exist on earth at his time, without exception, in the ship that noah has built to protect his followers from the great flood, and all the creatures that did exist on earth at noah’s time did fit in noah’s ship that noah has built from wood? This would only be possible if noah’s ship was big enough to be able to contain (and fit in/on it) all the life forms that did exist on earth at noah’s time, and that is definitely impossible, if the life forms that did exist on earth at noah’s time all were of the same number of species that exists now or in the twenty first century on earth, and if the life forms that did exist on earth at noah’s time all were of the same number of species that exists now or in the twenty first century on earth they would need a ship that would be of a size way much bigger than could any ship be built from wood reach or be and still be able to float without sinking, even on still non turbulent (sea or ocean or river or any kind of) water.

Or in other words it is impossible to build a ship of this size – the size of the ship that would be (and has to be and must be and needs to be) big enough to fit all the life forms that did exist on earth at noah’s time if the life forms that did exist on earth at noah’s time all were of the same number of species that exists now or in the twenty first century on earth – from wood, no matter what, or no matter who the builder is, and (at the same time that ship) would be able to do its job and float on water whether there is turbulence in the water or not, even if the water was as steady as the water in a standing still closed bottle of water placed on non moving and non vibrating ground,

(a ship of that size could never be built from wood only, no matter what, and still (despite the ship being of this big enough size and built from only wood (or made of wood only)) be able to do its job and float on water, whether there is turbulence in the water or not, even if the water was as steady as the water in a standing still closed bottle of water placed on non moving and non vibrating ground,)

And if the life forms that did exist on earth at noah’s time all were not of the same number of species that exists now or in the twenty first century on earth, but the life forms that did exist on earth at noah’s time all were of a much lesser number of species than that exists now or in the twenty first century on earth, and the life forms that did exist on earth at noah’s time all were of a number of species small enough to fit a male and a female of every species that did exist on earth at noah’s time in a ship made of wood with the size of the ship possible to make the ship unsinkable despite the ship being wooden and made of wood only, this would still be impossible to be true, for other reasons, one of them is from where did the current number of species of all life forms on earth that exist on earth in the twenty first century come from? If they were created afterwards by god on earth from nothing, then what was the point in taking a male and a female from every species that existed during noah’s time and placing it in/on noah’s ship before the great flood started? Why would god ask noah to preserve all the species of all the living organisms that existed at noah’s time, when god would already create new species afterwards (it would only be reasonable if that order from god to noah (to preserve all the species of all the living organisms that existed at noah’s time by taking a male and a female from every species that existed during noah’s time and placing it in/on noah’s ship before the great flood started) was because god would not attempt to create any new species or any living thing from nothing on earth directly anymore)? Why not recreate those species that did exist before the great flood as well if god has decided to create new species anyway (to fill the gap of the number of species that didn’t exist at noah’s time on earth and does exist on earth now or in the twenty first century) from nothing on earth or outside earth or outside the universe then place them (the freshly created new species of living organisms) on earth? Will it bother him to recreate despite him being almighty and all powerful for no reason? (Religious people would reply to this by saying they do not know why but there must have been a good reason for this or else god wouldn’t have done what he has done. And since religious people have no problem in believing in what they do not know anything about and believing in uncertain things they would have no problem in adding to their pile of already believed without being understood or proved or known or made sure of/about things). Did god change his opinion? Don’t religions claim that god is already all knowing and perfect from the start enough to not learn anything new to make him see something different and new better than he has seen before or from the start? And if god didn’t create those new species of living organisms (that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred from the start from nothing by himself) then from where did they (those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred) come from? Then they must have originated from ways other than being created by god. Or in other words they (those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred) were not (and can’t have been and are impossible to have been) created by a god. If they (those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred) came through means of evolution, then that would take a very long time to occur and be possible. If the time from the great flood of noah until the twenty first century was that long (long enough for all those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred to come to existence through means of evolution), then that would only be proof of the theory of evolution being correct, right and true. If it (the time from the great flood of noah until the twenty first century) were not that long (long enough for all those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred to come to existence through means of evolution) (following the evolution theory) it would be impossible for those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred to come to existence through means of evolution. And it has been stated and clarified and discussed and proved above here that (those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred) were not (and can’t have been and are impossible to have been) created by a god. This (all of the above) makes the claiming of [the time from the great flood of noah until the twenty first century was not that long (long enough for all those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred to come to existence through means of evolution) (following the evolution theory)] by anyone whatsoever impossible to be true or correct or right, unless this claimer has a valid and confirmed and proved evidence that there is another way – other than creation from nothing by god directly or through evolution (whether it was believed that evolution does require a god to start or begin in its first steps or at a certain time of the past or evolution can occur without a god in the first place at all not at any time of the evolutionary processes whatsoever or evolution did occur without a god in the first place at all not at any time of the evolutionary processes whatsoever) – for those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred to come to existence and originate and be. This means that (because the time from the great flood of noah until the twenty first century was that long (long enough for all those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah had occurred to come to existence through means of evolution), then that would only be proof of the theory of evolution being correct, right and true) the only acceptable and reasonable and possible (to be true and correct and right) explanation of how all those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah (had occurred) have come to existence (or have come to exist) is that all those new species of living organisms that did not exist on earth before the great flood of noah (had occurred) have come to existence through (means of) evolution (and this proves that the theory of evolution is correct, right and true).

And this proves that what is claimed to have happened in religious texts (regarding the prophet noah and noah’s ship and noah’s great flood) is impossible to be true without the theory of evolution to be true also, and the proving of the theory of evolution to be true in itself proves religion and everything in any religious text whatsoever to be wrong, false and impossible to be true, correct or right. And the proving of this entire story of noah and noah’s ship and the great flood is a big lie and impossible to be true or right or correct (not only unreasonable to happen but also unreasonable to be possible to have happened or occurred ever on earth in any time in the past whatsoever no matter how recent or long ago this point of time is as well) is proof enough in itself that everything in any religious text whatsoever is wrong, and false and impossible to be true, correct or right; because if any god did exist, he would never lie to those whom he created for any reason whatsoever, and at the same time say in the religious texts he gave to mankind that he (the almighty god) never does lie (never lies even if that lying was for the good of those whom he created) and everything that he (god) says must be true and correct and right and never a lie and never not true and correct and right, no matter what.

This has been taken from a lot of meanings that Bill Nye delivered during his debate with Ken Ham.

There is no god. All religions (whether major or not, and whether divine or not) are total lies. Religions are based on indoctrination of normal people and religions are based on manipulating normal people through guilt and delusions of after life that they use to abolish their fear of being not controlled against their will by an external force and for outside reasons and also religions use the countless delusions and lies found in each and every religious text and religious literature to indoctrinate and manipulate normal people and all non-Genius humans into doing and being what these religions contain and are made of, through the abuse of guilt, delusion, idiotic emotions, impossible beliefs, just stating the obvious, and abolishing the fear of death and the promising of a better future after life after death that makes nothing in this first life matter to religious believers, including themselves, and also makes them not feel bad because of their knowing that they are total idiots and are totally not important and are nothing, because what matters to them is what will happen to them in the after life and also the appreciation and respect and evaluation of their imaginary friend they call god.

Believing in an afterlife has an impact on how a person behaves. It modifies the way you view your importance. When I tell a lot of people who call me obsessive that I am not, it is just that they are not important to themselves, I mean that since they are religious believers, the importance of their bodies to them and whatever happens in this first life gets diminished infinitely, because they will be granted another body in the afterlife that is better and everlasting, and the afterlife is eternal, and if they believe in God and do what he says then they will end up in heaven which is a place better than what life on earth could ever reach or be, and because of that, the importance of a transient and of a lesser quality vessel they just happen to exist in during their first life is almost zero. This belief gives them comfort and happiness when there is not, and that is why most of them describe mood swings as something they experience as a normal physiological phenomenon that is inescapable because life on earth is meant to be imperfect by its creator. When dopamine is released for no reason it gets flushed down the toilet, baby because it is useless, just got there by mistake. When that happens (the dopamine withdrawal), they feel life has no meaning, and nothing helps, so they turn to God for comfort that they won’t be able to receive unless they don’t give a damn about their first life. It just simply says just release the damn dopamine anyway, who gives a fuck, it’s ruined from the start because the creator of the universe meant it to be so, so just submit and enjoy whatever little leftover by God in this world while you still can, be depressed without being depressed about being depressed, that is the normal, and that is inevitable, and there is no way out, so accept it as it is, or else you will suffer in hell for eternity in addition to the normal inescapable suffering of the first life that God has destined to every human that has ever lived on earth.

This is a mentality that is basic to religion. It is comfort where there is none. Religious people like religion because it helps them to function normally. It makes it easier for them to do stuff and enjoy the moment when they don’t have to care about the consequences of their actions, because all this is not forbidden stuff, and so there is nothing to worry about. It is funny that some say stop worrying and enjoy your life because there is no God, when in fact believing in God makes the ground to justify the eradication of worry from your life because there is a comforting answer to everything that could give rise to some worry in your life. There is always that pat on the back, it’s okay, God has taken care of this stuff for you. I’ve had countless people tell me don’t think, leave it all for God to take care of it for you, and this way it will be solved for you better than any way you could solve it on your own by thinking. The deeper you are in religion, the more you can act without caring about the consequences of your actions, and the faster you would seem to be in the eyes of those who have no idea what real speed is, and the less obsessive you would seem in the eyes of those who have no idea what obsessiveness really is, because for them, not being able to let go of something that you want to do is a disease, and if you are a natural let goer of stuff you are healthy at least mentally, and you are less crazy, because obsessiveness and desire are the traits of Satan followers, not of people who truly believe in God.

Religion makes people faster, because nothing matters in the first life, not even their own selves and not even their own bodies.

The theory of evolution is true, and explains the origin of species. Creationists are wrong. The entire universe and all it contains were never created by any god whatsoever, and that is not just what has actually happened and has actually occurred, but also this is impossible to be and is impossible to occur or happen in any universe whether existent or imaginary, real or unreal, whether it is our universe or any other universe whatsoever, and is impossible even in a hypothetical universe. It can’t be. Gods do not exist. The creation of anything by a god is impossible. And the control of anything whatsoever in the universe by gods is impossible. Miracles are impossible. Even if hypothetically there were any god, they can never do anything, not in our universe at least. Everything has a reason that makes it happen or occur or exist or be, and that or those reason(s) or cause(s) has (have) nothing to do with gods, not just because the actual truth is that there are no gods at all ever, but even if there were gods or any single almighty and all-knowing god whatsoever, the mere occurrence or happening or existence (or being) of anything because of a reason (or reasons and/or cause or causes) that does not include any super natural or natural interference by that god or those gods (and has nothing to do with any god whatsoever and none of these reasons or causes of anything existed or occurred or happened because of any god whatsoever, and would have occurred and happened and existed and have been anyway whether there was any god existing in the first place or not, and whether any god if hypothetically existed would have liked it or allowed it or wanted it or intended it to occur or happen or be or not no matter what) makes the idea that despite all this god is the one that made this thing happen or occur or be or exist and if it weren’t for god this thing or anything wouldn’t have happened or occurred or been or existed (the way it has happened or occurred or been or existed) idiotic in itself! This is in addition to the fact that all religions state that god is the one who does everything by himself and if it weren’t for god nothing would occur or exist or happen or be the way it is or has happened or occurred or has been or has existed ever, no matter what, and regardless of anything and even if there is any reason or any reasons that makes this thing or anything must be or occur or happen or exist or become otherwise or any different or not just as it actually turned out to be or not just as it has actually occurred or happened or existed or has been or has transpired or has resulted in or has become, no matter what, and that is wrong in itself and impossible to be true and is impossible to be right and is impossible to be correct no matter what, and that is in addition to the fact that there is countless evidence that proves all this to be impossible to be true and impossible to be right and impossible to be correct no matter what) as well. If something is to be possible to have happened another way but didn’t because God didn’t want it to, this means that this thing could have happened otherwise if it weren’t for God, which would entail that it has happened the way it is because of God. If the insertion of God and the absence of God’s interference didn’t make a difference, then this thing happened the way it did not because of something God did but because of reasons that have nothing to do with God, or for no reason at all. If things can’t happen the way they do without God doing something to make them happen the way they do then these things must show something that proves God’s interference in them in a way that has led to these things happening the way they did. The absence of that evidence is astonishing. If what God does can’t be distinct from anything that can lead to these things happening without God doing them then these things either happened because of reasons that has nothing to do with God, or they can happen whether God did something that leads to these things happening or not. If God’s interference or what God does for anything to happen doesn’t make any difference on the thing happening or not, that is, the thing can still happen whether God did something that can lead to the thing happening or not, then this thing can happen whether God did something that leads to this thing happening or not. If the thing can still happen whether or not God did something to make it happen, then the thing can happen without God doing anything to make it happen, that is, the thing can happen independent from God doing anything to make this thing happen, then whatever God does doesn’t exist. If the same result could be reached without God doing anything to make that result happen, then what God does either has no effect on things happening or not or what God does doesn’t exist.