Whatever that you use as proof that your own religion is the one true religion disproves your claims about your own religion along with any other religion that could ever exist.

According to the Quran, Islam is the only true theistic religion. The Quran mentions that Islam is made for all time, and that Islam in and of itself renders all other previous divine religious texts and theistic religions obsolete. According to the Quran, all non-Muslims are considered infidels and are to be tortured by God in hell for eternity, and they will never be forgiven or taken out of this eternal torture in hell for any reason or at any point in time later on, whether these non-Muslims are Jews, Christians, following or believing in any religion other than Islam, agnostic, or atheists. According to Islam, all of the above or all of these categories mentioned earlier are sentenced to torture in hell for eternity alike, without redemption, without the luxury of any further appeal, and without this ever being subject to reconsideration or change by God for any reason, and whether those non-Muslims were against Islam in any way, opposed Islam by any degree, were in favor of Islam, liked Islam and Muslims and treated them nicely, never harmed or threatened the existence of Islam itself or the spread of Islam, or never worsened or attacked the image of Islam or affected how much Islam appeals to non-Muslims, and even if these non-Muslims never harmed, endangered, or threatened any Muslim, and even if these non-Muslims totally believe in god beyond the shadow of a doubt. A lot of people who misrepresent or misinterpret Islam and who claim to be religious moderates whether Muslim moderates or Non-Muslim moderate religious believers claim that this is not indicated in Islam and should be considered as a misinterpretation or misrepresentation of the Quran, or only a radical or an extremist version of Islam, but the evidence of all of the above being factual is abundant and more than enough in the Quran itself. It is literally all over the place in the Quran, without being indirect or subject to being considered metaphoric, or having the potential to be understood otherwise or in any other way. And there’s nothing in the hadith that indicates otherwise or contradicts with any of the above.

It is still, however, possible to experience whatever feelings, spirituality, and faith as a result of practicing religious prayer despite not being Muslim. Why would God give those feelings and effects of religious prayer to someone who he will later condemn to an eternity of hell?

These spiritual states should be exclusive to Muslims in this case. Only Muslims should be able to have those religious or spiritual experiences. Especially those who lead you to assume certainty about Islam being the only one true religion from God there is or currently present or available to humanity.

Why would any Christian feel bad in a special way after committing anything that is considered to be sinful, immoral, bad, forbidden, or wrong in Christianity, that is identical to how bad Muslims feel for example because of or after committing something that is considered to be of the same magnitude of how sinful, immoral, bad, forbidden, or wrong it is according to their own religion Islam, while feel virtually nothing after committing sins or crimes that are considered insanely sinful and an atrocity according to the standards set by Islam, but are not considered to be forbidden, bad, immoral, sinful, or wrong under Christianity. For example, drinking wine or lending money with interest. Simultaneously, both religions claim that the only reason you don’t feel bad after sin is because you don’t believe in God. They both seem to have no problem with considering your inability to feel bad after committing any religious sin to be due to you being an infidel or a religious non-believer, although according to Islam and Christianity, both members of the other religion and those who don’t believe in either Christianity or Islam are equally infidel or non-believers who will be sentenced to hell for eternity by God. To them, it doesn’t matter where you came from. All that matters is whether you believe in their own one true religion or not. Treatment in the first life may differ, but punishment in the afterlife would be virtually the same in both cases of Christianity and Islam. And for some reason you still believe that your certainty about the subject matter of whether or not there is a God, and that this God is certainly your own religion’s version of God, through relying solely on how certain and how strongly you feel about what you believe is somehow still reliable evidence for such a colossal claim.

Even Muslims who believe that something is not a sin do not feel bad when they do or commit it. Whilst other Muslims who believe that this same thing is a sin, (because of their differences in interpretation, understanding, or views of what is to be considered right or wrong in their own version of religion, in this instance, Islam), feel bad and guilty when they do this same thing or commit this same act. And if these same Muslims doubt the existence of God or question any of his teachings, commandments, or will concerning anything that happens in this world, they might end up feeling way worse than they could ever feel because of or after doing or committing anything that is forbidden under Islam that is considered to be of less magnitude in terms of sin than the sin of infidelity or disbelief in god, including how guilty they feel afterwards all the time because of what they did.

Islam for example, claims that all such negative feelings including the guilt and remorse, are all some form of punishment by god to the sinful.

If that was true then any Christian would never feel bad when they do something they believe to be forbidden or considered to be sinful according to Christianity, just because they are not Muslim, and thus are lost or doomed anyway no matter what they do or don’t do.

What about feeling good after they, despite being Christian, repent? How could any Christian feel good after they repent, if the claims made by Islam were true?

How about the way a Christian feels after believing that God has answered their prayers?

Moreover, Christians pray and see, or at least think, that their prayers have been answered by God, despite Islam making the claim that God does not answer prayers from religious non-believers, or from anyone who is not Muslim, no matter how hard they try. 

This is impossible to take place unless whatever that makes any Christian believe their prayers have been answered by God is the same that makes any Muslim believe their prayers have been answered by God as well. In other words, a false fixed belief, a delusion.

One need only believe in a supernatural deity residing in the sky that answers prayers and controls everything there is in order to feel any of the above emotional certainties that are perpetually used by religious believers to justify their positions toward religion. After the above demonstration, it should be clear to you that whatever feelings, spiritual or otherwise, including changes in mood, not to mention any form of invisible connection or communication you might have with God is all but a delusion, that only feels true because you profoundly believe in it. 

At least the fact that any of these feelings seem to be identical no matter which religion you believe in should indicate that your certainty about your own religion or version of religion to be the one true religion from the one and only true creator of the universe should be questioned, or should at least not remain so intact, not to mention totally nullified. At least your spiritual claims and beliefs shouldn’t remain that certain, or shouldn’t retain that much certainty from now on. And that it is very likely to be based upon something that exists because you were severely indoctrinated at some point in your lifetime prior to no longer feeling the necessity of exercising doubt or skepticism upon anything unless it falls under the category of politics or the government.

According to Islam (the Quran) only Muslims are on the right major theistic religion since the appearance of Islam and the beginning of the prophecy of the Islamic only and final (last) prophet, and the mentioning of the Quran that Islam is made for all time till judgment day and that god made Islam to dominate all other previous divine religious texts and all other major and minor theistic religions is not the reason why the single Islamic prophet is the final prophet, because there could be more prophets that come after him later on that are also Islamic and provide some kind of refreshment for Islam as a religion without providing a whole (brand) new religion like what Christianity has done to the Jewish religion. The distinction between both is that Islam in the Quran makes a distinction between a religious messenger from god, and a prophet follower of the last religion’s messenger or the major theistic religion that the last messenger from god so far has come with or has delivered to humanity from god. These prophets as Islamic texts explain are just rulers with the religion according to the current situations, they are like the court of law that uses existing law and applies it correctly to the variable occurring new situations, and what makes those prophets not just people who know and apply religion correctly on the new era of humanity is their being special because of their being chosen by god to be directly inspired by god in whatever they say or do or know, or in other words, god directly communicates verbally with those prophets, regardless of their religion, and tells them the divine words of truth about anything and everything, whether through angels like arch angel Gabriel or through dreams or directly through making those prophets receive gods words without the word of god being delivered to them through any medium and while they are wide awake, and they don’t just receive the word of god in actual words but they receive the meanings and then they may express them in their own words later on if they intend to teach these meanings delivered to them from god or inspired to them by god to someone else, it is like god directly inspires them with the content that god wants them to know in the form of meaning and understanding instead of words which these prophets may misinterpret because they just receive the words of god from god without god explaining to them everything about god’s teachings and inspirations, so god gives them the understanding and meanings instead of just words, and this is another difference between prophets and non-prophets in Islamic texts. According to Islamic texts, only prophets receive meanings and understandings directly from god and not just words that they attempt to understand after listening to them. And according to Islamic texts also prophets are different from messengers only in that messengers have an obligation from god to spread what they have learnt (without holding anything back for themselves or because people may misunderstand it at that time) to the entire group of people or region or race they have been sent to, while prophets do not necessarily have that obligation from god to teach anyone else what god inspires them with, no matter what, except if these prophets are at the same time messengers. According to Islamic texts, a prophet may or may not be simultaneously a messenger from god to humanity, but a messenger from god is definitely a prophet from god as well, as long as this messenger is human (and not an angel or non-human being). When Islamic texts indicate literally that there is no prophet or messenger ever after the single and only first and last prophet of Islam who gave the Muslims the whole and only version of Quran, this is not the proof why Islam is made for all humanity and for all time until the judgment day, but the proof of why Islam was made for all humanity and for all places on earth and for all time on earth until the judgment day, {which is the end for the validity of Islam not because it will be replaced by another religion but because the Quran indicates literally that whomever believes in Islam (to be the only right religion since Islam has appeared) and the Islamic single and only and first and last prophet after admitting that the judgment day is inevitably true because of signs that indicate the impossibility of the judgment day not being true has come to existence and has become observable to all humans on earth his belief in god and Islam and the Islamic prophet will then be too late to be accepted by god and he will still be considered infidel, even if he believed in god through the Christian religion or the Jewish religion or through believing and/or following any major theistic religion other than Islam (the full Islamic major theistic religion that the Quran has come with and not just what prophets before Islam were all considered Muslims because of, even (or including) the prophet Ibrahim or Abraham),} according to Islamic texts and as indicated literally by the Quran is in Islam being the final religion made by god and that god has made that final religion (Islam) to be for all time and for all humanity to follow and for all places on earth, and god in the Quran literally says that he (god himself) has replaced all other previous major and minor theistic religions with his final version of divine theistic religion of Islam in the Quran and the words of the Islamic prophet that are not Quran themselves, and not just as an optional replacement, or an optional upgraded version of any major theistic religion ever, but as an obligatory replacement of all major and minor theistic religions of all time, that if not followed, would make the non-follower of this replacement religion – the Islam – an infidel that god would sentence to be tortured in hell for eternity, no matter what, and no matter how good this human was and no matter what the major theistic religion that this human was following all his life was (or is), as long as this human was not Muslim, no matter what, this human would be considered by god to be the worst ever of humans, if this human was not a Muslim, if this human existed at any moment of time after the declaration of Islam and the prophecy of the single and only Islamic prophet has appeared and reached him (the message of having to be a Muslim has reached this human), and this human is considered by god an infidel that is sentenced to be tortured in hell for eternity no matter what even if this human never opposed Islam and was never against Islam or any Muslim whatsoever, and never battled against Islam or any Muslim whatsoever, and never did anything that could harm Islam or Muslims in any way ever and never did anything that could affect the continued existence of Islam or the continued or started spreading of Islam or the appeal of Islam to any Muslim or non-Muslims or any other human whatsoever anywhere on earth at any time ever, if this human was from or of or following any major theistic religion whatsoever (even Christianity and Jewish religions) just because this human is not Muslim, and according to Islamic texts and the Quran no individual can be Muslim and also Christian at the same time or Muslim and Jewish simultaneously, as Islam and any other religion are mutually exclusive, and one cannot be Muslim while being or believing in or following any other major or minor theistic religion other than Islam or believing that any other major or minor theistic religion is valid or okay to be followed currently after the appearance of Islam and the knowing of this individual of Islam’s existence. This means that according to literal Islamic texts interpretation, and according to literal interpretation of the Quran and the Islamic prophet’s words that are not Quran, all those that are not Muslims that existed on earth since the Islamic religion was fully delivered from god to humanity on earth for all time and for all places and for all humans until judgment day, are considered infidels and are definitely – (and without doubt except from infidels) that all of those (that are not Muslims) – sentenced and condemned to be tortured by god (after (the) judgment day (is over)) in hell for eternity, and they will never be forgiven or taken out of this eternal torture in hell for any reason whatsoever or at any point later on ever, no matter what, whether these humans who are not Muslims are Christians or Jewish or following and believing in any major or minor theistic religion whatsoever other than Islam, or are agnostic or are atheists, all are sentenced to be tortured by god in hell for eternity alike, without redemption and without this sentence ever changing or stopping or being reconsidered by god for any reason whatsoever, no matter what, and whether these humans who are not Muslims were against Islam in any way ever or opposed Islam by any degree ever or were in favor of Islam or even liked Islam and Muslims and treated them nicely and never harmed or threatened the existence of Islam itself or the spread of Islam or worsened or attacked the image of Islam or affected the appealing of Islam to non-Muslims ever and even if these humans who are not Muslims never harmed or endangered or threatened any Muslim whatsoever (by) any degree of harm or danger or threat whatsoever, no matter what, and even if these humans who are not Muslims totally without any degree of doubt ever believed in god and judgment day and heaven and hell and that all prophets and messengers of god are not liars, no matter what. A lot of people who misrepresent Islam and who claim to be religious moderates whether Muslim moderates or Non-Muslim moderate religious believers claim that this is not indicated in Islam and should be considered as a misinterpretation of Quran and a radical and an extremist version of Islam but the evidence of that all that which has been written in this point is factual and true and correct and right in the Quran and is what the Quran literally indicates and says, and is also what the words of the single and only Islamic prophet that are not Quran indicates and says and mean, is undeniable and overwhelming, and makes these matters of no debate for Muslims and Islam like the fact that Jesus was not crucified in Islam, but the guy who was crucified wasn’t Jesus at all but he was someone else that looked like Jesus. Saying that Islam does not literally mean or indicate or state without doubt that any of the above that is written in this point is true or right or correct or fact is like saying the text and words of the Quran indicate that the Quran itself is not the word of god (or saying that the Quran itself indicates or says that the Quran itself is made by a human or someone else other than god himself) (to humanity). According to the Quran the Quran text itself is the spoken word of god, and is not the expression of the meanings that are inspired by god to the only human single Islamic prophet in the only human single Islamic prophet’s own words. And according to all of the above that is written in this point, god is never pleased with anyone who is not Muslim, and this proves that all the feelings and all the spiritual effects and faith that any human that is not Muslim gets from prayer or from this human doing or making any religious thing whatsoever is but a delusion, as god will never make anyone who is considered by god himself to be an infidel and will thereby be sentenced and condemned to be tortured in hell for eternity feel good in any way whatsoever or be better in any way whatsoever because of their religious practices or prayer or anything they do that they believe is supposed to make them go to heaven and please god and avoid going to hell without them being Muslims, no matter what. God will never make anyone who is considered by god himself to be an infidel and will thereby be sentenced and condemned to be tortured in hell for eternity be in any state whatsoever that only Muslims are supposed to be in or reach from following god’s only right religion – the Islamic religion – through any religious practice or religious thing whatsoever (including prayer) that these humans do or make or follow while these humans are not Muslims, no matter what. And at the same time god makes disobedient (people who disobey god and god’s words) Muslims and sinful Muslims themselves feel bad because of them disobeying god and because of their sins, no matter how they try to feel good or be good despite their sins as long as they are still Muslims. Even Muslims who believe that something is not a sin do not feel bad when they do it, while other Muslims who believe that this same thing is a sin (because of their difference in interpretation and understanding and views of or in the religious texts and the Quran) feel bad and guilty when they do this same thing. And if these same Muslims disbelieve in god (and become infidels) they feel that they feel even worse than they ever did because of doing anything that was forbidden in Islam but was lesser than infidelity or disbelief in god, and they have much more guilt than they have ever felt before from doing anything that is forbidden in Islam that is lesser (that is not) than infidelity and disbelief in god. According to Islam all these guilt feelings are and all this feeling bad and misery is a direct torture from god or at least directly caused by god to humans because god does this (causing of humans to feel guilty and feel bad and be miserable) to anyone who has strayed from (or has left or has abandoned or has disobeyed) the right and correct strict following of Islam and the Islamic religion and the Quran. If that was true then any Christian would never feel bad when he (this same Christian) does something he (this same Christian) believes is forbidden (or considered a sin) according to Christianity or by god (if they are good followers of Christianity and have strong faith like a Christian cardinal or a Christian pope for example) but nevertheless they do feel bad when they do or make something that they believe is forbidden (or considered a sin) by Christianity or by god although they are not Muslims, and any Christian would never feel good after he (this same Christian) apologizes to god and asks for god’s forgiveness and seeks redemption until this Christian feels that god has forgiven him and until this Christian feels redeemed by good and forgiven by god and that god has answered his prayers, but many Christians do feel good after he (this Christian) apologizes to god and asks for god’s forgiveness and seeks redemption until this Christian feels that god has forgiven him and until this Christian feels redeemed by god and forgiven by god and that god has answered his prayers although this human Christian is not Muslim. Moreover, Christians pray and see their prayers answered by god, despite god saying god will never answer prayers from those who are infidels and those who are not Muslims because those who are not Muslims are infidels and disbelievers in god, because if they believed in god they would have been Muslims only because god said god will never accept any religion from any human being whatsoever other than Islam after the completion of the delivery of Islam to humanity through the only single Islamic prophet. This is impossible to be true unless whatever that makes any Christian believe his prayers have been answered by god is the same that makes any Muslim believe his prayers have been answered by god as well, and if it is not something spiritual delivered from god directly to the non-prophet human, then it could never be anything but imagination or more precisely a delusion created by the mind of each of the Muslim human and the Christian human alike, the delusion that there is a god that exists and answers prayers from those humans who believe in god and believe in god’s ability of answering any prayer from any faithful believer in god whatsoever, no matter what. In addition, if that is the case then either all these religious feelings and spiritual effects and mood changes and invisible connections and communications with god are all a delusion, or are from god, and if these things are a delusion then they must never be used as a proof that god exists by believers even if these believers experience or feel these things almost every day, and if these things are from god (if these things that are invisible communications and spiritual connections with god are real and these feelings of guilt and feeling bad because of sins and feeling miserable because of doing or making sins or things that are forbidden in the major theistic religion that is believed in and being followed by this human or these humans are real) and are directly sent from god to humans who believe in god, then these things could never be received by anyone considered by god to be the same as any agnostic or atheist, as god will never make anyone who is considered by god himself to be an infidel or a disbeliever in god and will thereby be sentenced and condemned to be tortured in hell for eternity be in or reach or receive or get or feel any (spiritual or religious) state whatsoever that only Muslims are supposed (according to Islamic texts and the Quran and the words of the single and only Islamic prophet that are not Quran or of the Quran) to be in or reach or receive or get or feel from god from (or because of) following god’s only right religion – the Islamic religion – (while this human becomes in or reaches or receives or gets these (spiritual or religious) states) through any religious practice or religious thing whatsoever (including prayer) that this human does or makes or follows while this human is not Muslim, no matter what. And so if any human who is not Muslim becomes in or reaches or receives or gets or feels any (spiritual or religious) state whatsoever through any religious practice or religious thing whatsoever (including prayer) that this human does or makes or follows while this human is not Muslim, no matter what, then this proves that the Islamic texts and the Quran and the words of the single and only Islamic prophet that are not Quran or of the Quran contain claims that are not true or correct or right, because this proves that Christians are not infidels and Christians are not regarded by god to be like atheists and agnostics by god in judgment day and Christians will not be sentenced to be tortured in hell for eternity even if they heard everything about Islam but never became Muslims themselves unless (the only way to defend the Islamic Quran and the words of the single and only Islamic prophet that are not Quran and all religious texts and claim they are not wrong and do not contain anything wrong or not true or not correct is to admit the fact (that is true and right and correct) that) what both Christians and Muslims feel and experience of faith from god and spirituality from god and invisible spiritual connections with god and invisible spiritual direct communications with god and answering of prayer(s) from god is all but a delusion (because if all this is not from god then all this is definitely a delusion in the minds of the human believers in and/or followers of any major or minor theistic religion whatsoever no matter what) and (so is also) a lie and not true and is incorrect and is all wrong (as well), and (all) this proves that the Quran is not the word of god because the word of god (as claimed in the Quran that god himself says that god’s words) could never contain any lie or anything that is not true or correct or right whatsoever, and if the Quran is not the word of god, then the Quran is all but a lie and the Quran is all wrong and is all incorrect and is all not true, or at least (or at most) the Quran could never be anything except something made by a human being and not made by (any) god (whatsoever) or through (any god whatsoever) or because of (any god whatsoever) or as a result of god’s existence or god’s inspiration to any human being whatsoever, which either way proves Islam to not be a divine theistic religion from god at all, and only possible to be a human made religion that is not from (any) god (whatsoever) and has nothing to do with (any) god (whatsoever) at all, at least in the process of the making of anything (of the) Islamic (religion and texts), including all the Quran itself and all the words of the single and only Islamic prophet that are not Quran as well.

Whatever that can create such complex universe is bound to be even more too complex to be able to come to being on its own without needing to be created at all at any point as well.

It is often claimed that since the entire universe along with everything in it are too complex to come to existence on its own or without having been created by anyone or anything external to them that is totally separate and distinct from them and not part of any of them. This still doesn’t make it less likely to have been created by multiple entities or Gods. If something is harder to achieve, it is supposed to be rendered easier to an extent by making many entities work on it, instead of just one entity. At least in most cases. Sometimes, things become easier or better when you do them all on your own only without any external assistance or help from anybody else whatsoever. But at least this is not a case where you say this definitely was created by one God only, and cannot have been created by multiple Gods at all, no matter what.  The argument that coincidence can’t result in all this universe and all that is in the universe is countered by that the creation of the entire universe and everything in that universe the way it is, is also less likely to be done by one entity, which makes the idea that the universe and what’s in it were created by multiple entities or Gods much more likely, assuming of course, that any of the above had to be created and cannot come to existence any other way. In addition, if the universe is too difficult or complex to come to being on its own, it would still be too difficult for any single entity there is to be able to create the entire universe with everything there is that is inside this universe alone all on its own. It is way less likely that the universe with everything that’s in it were created from nothing by a single entity than any other explanation that could be proposed for the phenomena. Certainty about the assumption that it was all created from nothing by a single God only indicates that you don’t care about the truth and that you are just a part of a cult that wants to control every aspect of your and everybody else’s thinking and behavior, without having to think about anything at all ever. It is easier to believe that the entire universe and all that the entire universe contains originated on their own, came to be on their own, or were always there without having a beginning at some point than it is to assume that there’s no acceptable explanation in this scenario except attempting to believe that the entire universe and all that the entire universe contains must have been created by one entity, whether this one or single creator of the universe entity is a God, as described in any theistic religion, or anything else whatsoever. Whatever that created the too complex to come to existence on its own universe and everything there is that’s in it is bound to be even more too complex to come to existence on its own without having to be created at some point prior to its existence as well. In this case, the perpetual question remains: Who created God? 

Belief in a God to be the ultimate explanation of existence of anything and everything does not solve the problem of how things came to be. It just increases the number of things that cannot be explained whilst explaining nothing of what didn’t have an explanation before proposing such solution.

The entire universe with everything in it is too complex to come from the creation of one entity. The argument that coincidence can’t result in all this universe and all that is in the universe is countered by that the creation of the entire universe and everything in that universe the way it is is impossible to be done by one entity no matter what. And just because the universe is too difficult to originate on its own does not necessarily mean that it had to be created, because one entity (no matter what or who this entity is) can never create the entire universe with all that the universe is consisted of and all that the universe contains, no matter what. Assuming that a god must have created this universe because the universe and all that the universe contains are too difficult and complex is infinitely more unlikely than the fact that the universe and all that the universe contains originated on their own. The fact that the entire universe and all that the entire universe contains originated on their own is infinitely more likely and possible and reasonable and acceptable to be true and right and correct than the false belief that the entire universe and all that the entire universe contains must have been created by one entity, whether this one creator entity is a god (as described in any major theistic religion) or anything (else) whatsoever.

Why is God always an exception? If anything, adding consciousness, free will, intelligence, thought, and intention to something makes it even less likely to come to being on its own because it would be even more too complex to come to existence without having been created than any non-living thing, matter, or energy could ever be.

If God created everything other than himself, then where did God exist (where was his physical being existing in) before he created everything that exists or has ever existed? If god created all existence then where was God before that? How could God exist nowhere? How could God exist in total nothingness? And if there was something that he could exist in, or needed its presence in order to be able to come to existence or in order for God to find something that he could exist in or be physically present in, because you assume that nothing in the universe could exist without the universe itself being present first, because nothing can exist in vacuum, how come then you assume that he created everything there is from nothing, when he was not the first thing ever that was present when he appeared out of nowhere, or when he wasn’t the first thing ever to come to being? How can you still assume that he must have created everything there is from nothing, without exception, when something else was present or existed before he came to being? This still means that something must have existed before this God created everything there is to create, because he cannot create where he’d be or be physically present in before creating himself or before he even existed. Which means that God didn’t create everything there is. And he cannot exist in total nothingness or absolute vacuum. Even God cannot exist in nothing. He has to be somewhere. If it’s okay for God to exist in such nothingness, then it’s okay for the universe to come to being in that same absolute vacuum or total nothingness, which is the state of the universe or all existence that you assume existed before God decided to create anything else other than himself. One need not pave the way for us or for anything else to come to existence before they even arrive, be created, or come to existence, if God himself can exist or come to existence in total nothingness or absolute vacuum, without needing anything whatsoever to exist before him in order for him to be able to come to existence. In this case, or if this were true, things can be created in total nothingness or absolute vacuum. Which means we don’t need someone or something to create anything to pave the way for or make it possible for anything else to start existing or to come to being. If God needs something before he begins to exist, or before he comes to existence, then he didn’t create everything, therefore he is not God. If God doesn’t need something to exist before him in order to make it possible for him to exist, then whatever that exists inside the universe doesn’t need something to be set in motion or created first before them in order for them to be able to exist or come to existence. Either way, there is no God. In both cases, God doesn’t explain the origin of anything, not even himself. If God created where he is, then where was god before God created where God himself physically existed?

This physical form of existence of God must have existed ‘somewhere’. How could this physical form of existence of God exist somewhere, and not nowhere, or in or within nowhere, if God created everything that exists and everything that has ever existed in all time, and at the same time claim that God was present or has always existed before anything else ever, even vacuum. And that there was nothing before God at all. That is impossible to be true, and this means that the claim that God existed before anything else has ever existed is not true, and is impossible.

All this means that a God can’t exist before anything else ever came to being, as described in religious texts of various religions, where they claim that God has always been existing from the start before anything else.

* If god created everything other than god himself, then where did god exist (where was his physical being existing in) before he created everything that exists or has existed ever. If god created all existence then where was god before that? God created where he is then where was god before god created where god himself physically existed. And in Islamic texts it is well established that god has a physical existence and that when god says he did something by his hand, he doesn’t mean metaphorically, but he (god in the religious texts) means that he did what he said he did by his hand really by using his hand, and that is because god has a hand and if god has a hand then definitely (that is not just what they believe but what is impossible to not be true if god has a hand) god has a physical form of existence. (And Islamic religious followers has to believe that god has a hand if god says so in religious text like the Quran which are claimed to be the direct spoken word of god, and not a translation of what god wanted humanity to understand, and that is a very important distinguishing point between the bible and the Quran, the bible is acclaimed to be what god meant to tell humanity about but not necessarily in god’s own words, so a counter argument that says it is wrong to say that the literal interpretation of the bible if means something that science has proven wrong is not valid in proving the bible itself is proof of the falsehood of Christianity cannot (this counter argument) exist in case of the Quran of the Islamic religion, because the Quran itself as all Muslims believe it to be is the literal spoken word of god himself. God has ‘spoken all the Quran’ by himself is what all Muslims believe without a doubt.). This physical form of existence of god must have existed ‘somewhere’. How could this physical form of existence of god exist somewhere (and not in nowhere) if god created everything that exists and everything that has ever existed in all time, and at the same time claim that god was present (god has existed) before anything else ever, even vacuum. And there was nothing before god at all ever. That is impossible to be true and/or correct and/or right, and this means that god’s claim that he existed before anything else has ever existed is not true and not right and not correct and is impossible, and all this means that a god can’t exist as god has described himself to have existed from the start in religious texts of Islam or his prophet’s words, and this means that the Islamic text the Quran is incorrect and not true and not right, because the Islamic text of the Quran claims to be from a god that is all knowing and makes no mistakes and has never said anything incorrect or not true or not right in the Quran. And what is above proves that this is not the case, and so Islam is not a religion from a god in the first place, unless someone wants to believe in a god that says wrong or incorrect or untrue things without this god himself knowing that he (the god himself) has said wrong or incorrect or untrue things in what he (this god himself) claims to be free from any mistakes or anything wrong or untrue or incorrect.

Just put something that makes sense beside something else that doesn’t make sense and walk away before they start noticing that something is missing.

It is time we stopped accurately describing a problem and then proposing a solution that doesn’t make sense right afterwards. If life is too improbable to occur on earth on its own, ascribing its creation or design to an unknown all-knowing and all-mighty entity that no one has ever met before doesn’t help anyone or explain anything. It, in and of itself, requires a greater deal of explanation than what they are attempting to explain by proposing it.

If you’re going to say it is unlikely to occur on its own, so is God.

Why would it be easier for God to come to existence on his own, without needing to be created, or to just be existing since ever, without having a starting point of existence before which he never existed, but that very same attribute of eternal existence or being able to come to existence on their own is impossible to be true for or to be the case with matter, energy, or anything else whatsoever?

The problem is that you can arrive to any of these conclusions on your own at any point in human history, without necessarily needing science to suggest anything that could propel you in that direction. We didn’t think about any of those conclusions because of too much science. We arrived at such conclusions because we started thinking. None of the above conclusions needs any confirmation from science. They only need rationality, reason, and intelligence.

It is not all the probabilities that occurred until the first living thing emerged, but there was a coincidence that made the first life form exist from the start despite the extremely low chance and probability of it coming to existence from the start. It is not like all the possibilities ever have all occurred among which is the one outcome that is now regarded as the first life form on earth ever, but it is the one extremely unlikely and extremely rare possibility (the resultant first life form or living organism on earth) has occurred from the start coincidentally without all other possibilities occurring as well before it or with it at all (at least in our reality, because this occurrence of all the possibilities may have occurred in countless other alternate realities of ours and we are the only reality with the resultant outcome of a living organism emerging from non-living origins). It is like a very tiny hole that could pass only one electron at a time, and the location of this hole is north but not exactly known and could not be pin pointed yet (until it is detected by any means that could detect it), but you may definitely shoot an electron that passes through this tiny hole mentioned definitely by shooting infinite electrons all in the direction north in a width that covers all the possible locations of this tiny hole mentioned. It is always argued that it is impossible to hit all the locations one after the other until the location of the hole is hit because the probability of this is extremely low, and so it would take too long to actually shoot an electron in all the probable locations of the tiny electron hole mentioned, and that this is much longer than the time that the universe has existed so far, and so it is impossible to have happened, and there must have been a god that created it without probability but correctly from the start. This argument could be easily countered by the fact that the coincidence that the tiny electron hole mentioned is successfully hit and penetrated by an electron from the first attempt or a few attempts is not any less likely (to be accepted reasonably and rationally) to be what has actually happened and has occurred in our world than the coincidence of the existence of an all knowing and all powerful god that has not been created and has created everything by himself from the start, because both coincidences mentioned are as much unlikely as each other, and so neither should have the right to be reasonably and rationally and logically acceptable more than the other from this argument (of how much the probability of this to occur or exist is too low) only. This is in addition to the fact that it is also possible that all the probabilities of what could have been the outcome of what happened for the first life form or living organism to come to existence could have already happened and occurred in countless infinite realities each contained a possibility of all possibilities that could ever be, and our alternate reality is a reality where the successful extremely rare and low probability outcomes and possibilities of emerging of life from non-living things has existed and has occurred and has happened, without the trial and error of all the other possibilities and outcomes taking place in our alternate reality in the first place.

If you’re going to say it is unlikely, so is God. If you’re going to say it would take too long for all the probabilities to have happened until the unlikely event of an electron passing through the tiny hole already happens, then you can say how too long? Longer than the duration that extends between the moment earth came to exist until now? Can you claim that all these probabilities cannot occur all during this duration that extends from the moment the earth came to exist until now? Can you claim that every single wrong probability has to occur first before the right probability that actually hits the right hole? Does every single possibility has to happen first before the possibility of the electron passing through the right hole happen? If it is so unlikely then this might explain why it took so long to happen (for life to emerge on earth). There is no reason to believe that the duration for such an unlikely event to happen is longer than the duration from the earth’s first coming to existence and now.