A word on those who harm us without them being dumb

There are bad people out there. There is something called toxic people. You cannot hope to accomplish anything whatsoever or reach anything whatsoever if you are surrounded by or stuck with Toxic People. The problem with negative, evil, or toxic people is not only in them frustrating you, putting you in a negative mood, sucking or draining your energy, or making you less motivated or less enthusiastic, they change you to the worse gradually maybe even without you noticing that as well. They build or generate negative impulses and negative charges in your mind that if kept repressed, you will become mentally or productively paralyzed. It is so easy to make someone lose hope or drive to become or do something great. Extremely easy. You require your mind to be able to get back to your normal or default motivation and drive to stay great and do great stuff. Toxic, evil, and negative people prevent you from using your mind, throwing you in a state of emergency and stress that necessitates that you resort to your basic survival mechanisms just to overcome these situations. The result of this is staying stuck in the primitive mindset of just survival and getting by throughout this stressful period or phase. This stands between you and your ability to access your rational and reasonable self, and access your mind fully, which in turn leads to you being unable to stay motivated and succeed despite what these negative, evil, or toxic people say or do to you. It is like saying you will easily deal with some kind of difficult situation but not until you are actually stuck in this situation that you realize that you are unable to really help yourself when you are that trapped in this situation. Like being lost in a desert, the answer sounds simple, look for water, keep walking toward civilization, determine directions from the sun and the starts if possible, but when you are practically in these circumstances, and you are standing in the middle of a desert too far away from civilization, you face the real obstacles that make it so hard for you to just apply those instructions, and you find it really hard to fight giving up, and wonder why you suddenly became so pessimistic and even suicidal. Do not believe for a second that you will not be powerless when you are stuck with or trapped with toxic, evil, or negative people. These people suck the life out of you, cultivate depression, despair, pessimism, and loss of hope inside of you when they really don’t believe that themselves, but they are just enjoying the process of bringing someone else down to their level because they can’t stand the fact that you are doing better than they are. Even if they tried, they won’t reach anything, and this is not because they are stupid. The problem being presented here isn’t concerning low IQ people at all. It is about people who are bad, even if they are very smart. Like in Brilliant criminals. They would fail no matter how hard they try, because they identify themselves as not leaning towards being good. They like being degenerates. They enjoy not giving a damn about anything. Regardless of the real reasons that are responsible for them being this way, and I do not intend to simplify a complex issue here and explain the underlying etiology and mechanisms behind their criminal minds in a superficial, easy, or simple way, these people are not dumb, and they are happily destroying lives of others, and there is no probability or possibility of fixing them and changing them to the extent that they stop being evil, toxic, or negative. These people feed on harming others. It’s what they do. And they choose to be so, at least according to me, as opposed to those who explain their behavior and mentality to be something out of their control, like they are just victims, because they were abused when they were children or something of this nature that makes it inevitable for them to become that bad. They are smart, but they hate success and successful people. And so when they encounter one of them, they become triggered and stimulated to destroy them, just to reshape the world the way they feel the world would be better when it would look like, just to make the world come closer to what they believe is the best way people should all be like, just to change the world to the way they believe the world should look like. And it is not because they believe the world would be a better place if everybody else became like them, it is only that they can’t exist normally if they are not in a world that does not condemn their behavior or regard their behavior as bad. They just want to always be exonerated, no matter how bad their actions or crimes are. And it is not that I am in favor of punishing anyone who makes a mistake or something that is bad. This isn’t about revenge or vengeance. This is that they want normal people to consider these evil, toxic, or negative people as acceptable and normal and healthy and that there is nothing wrong with them no matter what they do or regardless of how bad their actions and crimes are. They just want to be free to destroy everything there is. And they just want to be free or allowed to destroy anything that has any kind of value to anybody else.

The Genius Human must eliminate the existence of Bad, negative, toxic, and/or evil people in his/her life. The Genius Human must never live with, connect with, contact, socialize with, tolerate, be friends with, have any conversation with, talk to, deal with, meet with, be near any negative, bad, evil, and/or toxic person or living organism whatsoever, no matter what. The Genius Human has to and must and needs to avoid bad, evil, negative, and/or toxic people or living organisms always all his/her life, every unit time of his/her life, no matter what. And The Genius Human needs to and has to and must make the existence of bad, evil, toxic, and/or negative people or living organisms in the life of the Genius Human zero or absolutely and totally absent and non-existent, no matter what.

The Genius Human’s stance on Cell Phones/Smart Phones

The Genius Human shouldn’t avoid cell phones/smart phones. Instead, it is highly recommended that The Genius Human embraces cell phones/smart phones. The Genius Human should extensively use cell phones for anything that he or she could do on the internet, and also make phone calls and receive phone calls when necessary, and there is no problem with any of that. I have indicated earlier in The Genius Human Book 1 that cell phones should not be used by the Genius Human at all, but what I meant back then was any interaction with the cell phone that involves the cell phone being put against your ears or being in close proximity to your head, that is, as long as the usage of the cell phone is while holding it in your hands and while keeping it away from your head by at least 10-30 centimeters then there is no problem at all, but in fact, it is encouraged and totally and very recommended, because there are countless things and stuff that you can do through a cell phone, and there is no harm from using a cell phone at all, as long as the cell phone is kept at a distance from your head that is enough to make the level of radiation coming from the cell phone harmless or like background radiation, that is, as long as the cell phone is kept at a distance from the Genius Human’s head that makes it as if the cell phone is turned off or switched off. In this case, it is highly recommended that the Genius Human uses a cell phone, for internet and for phone calls, whether through wireless connection to a router that is connected to the internet, or through a Sim Card that offers the cell phone internet access and the ability to make phone calls. By Cell phones I always mean what includes any kind of advanced cell phone that has been invented and this includes any kind of advanced smart phone there is.

Going back to religion is not the answer

The problems of our society or world today, anything that we complain about, or anything that is bad in our society or world today cannot be attributed to abandoning religion or relying too heavily on our self rationality, mind, and reason. In case of rational secularism there is a chance of refining what we hold as true. We can figure out and get rid of bad ideas through conversation, honest discussion, and sincerely chasing what is not going to harm our society or what is going to benefit our society the most. We can genuinely pursue the truth without being afraid of upsetting any kind of authority. No one’s words, beliefs, ideas, views, or opinions are regarded as sacred, inerrant, or never wrong. No one’s words, beliefs, ideas, views, or opinions are claimed to have a degree or special place above everybody else’s because he or she is inspired by the all-knowing one and only true inerrant creator of the universe. If there is a bad idea, belief, view, opinion or any words about anything, we would be able to detect it in case of relying on our rationality and self reason, and we wouldn’t be not allowed to oppose it, detect it, or explain why it is wrong because it came from a source that we lack the qualifications, right, or permission to criticize, not follow, not believe, or not totally obey; that is, an untouchable source like a God.

This is one of the causes of Major Depression.

One of the reasons of Depression is that we are mixed with a huge number of evil people. Your not being permitted to take action against them, or handle them the normal way evil people should be dealt with, is greatly frustrating, infuriating and depressing. Any amount of anger piling up inside you because of encountering such people will be forced to be contained and not acted upon due to defending yourself against such people being illegal and being considered a crime by law. Coexisting and tolerating such people degrades you and shuts down a large number of your brain cells to the extent that the remaining cells give up even trying to stay awake and excited. In the past, it was like a never ending quest just for everyone to enjoy being evil with everybody else without actually breaking any law or sometimes a religious teaching or command. As long as no one will find anything on them that proves these people to be criminals, the law will not protect you against such criminal people. After all, you are not a criminal because your mind is full of evil and you just enjoy making other people suffer, and you enjoy torturing and making other people miserable and you enjoy destroying other people’s lives. There is no penalty for being a psychopath, sociopath, or antisocial. The law only punishes committing certain crimes. Maybe religion wanted to fight against that by presenting that God watches even your inner thoughts, and will judge you accordingly, but still people worked around this by claiming only God really knows the reality of what is within those people, and you can’t be certain that someone is evil or you can’t be certain about what people are holding inside their minds without them expressing that clearly to others. So now you never know whether or not the person beside you is being occupied day and night by how he or she could destroy you while legally getting away with it. You should just sit there and wait until he initiates something illegal. This was worsened by being considered by many psychiatrists or psychologists as having paranoid delusions, every body is conspiring to harm you. What if they are not doing so to me in particular. What if everybody is conspiring within the confines of their minds to harm everybody else, but are only held back from executing such plans by the law? Is that you being delusional or ill? Or is it just that it turned out that the basic or normal nature of low IQ or average IQ people is pure evil? In the past, people just joined the battle because it was fun and no one had anything to lose, they just explained to their wives and children that people out there are bad, and we should be prepared to bypass or face that bad or evil nature of virtually everybody else, and we are not succumbing or giving in to this evil or bad nature of us with each other because we are just one family, and we should instead defend each other and protect each other. We only exercise this harm for fun with outsiders, strange people, or those who are not family. But still, in big families, evil was exercised and got away with by not finding any evidence to prove the claims that this family member or these family members really meant you harm. Sometimes this deal extended with friends, and it was with similar outcomes to those of this deal among members of the same big family or blood line. To an extent you might be permitted to hurt your friends for fun and stay friends regardless, but if someone who is a stranger does the same thing to you, he or she should expect you to fight back. Such a life was not opposed in the past because life then was extremely empty, boring, and is based upon self-deception and self delusion. It is like “Why are we here?” “To fool ourselves of course! What else are we going to do?”. Fool ourselves that we are happy, that we love each other, that we care about any topic that we are discussing, although it is all stuff that we are being driven toward by internal mechanisms that pushes us in these directions because there is no alternative, and we are only giving up or giving in to these pulling or pushing forces because we have no choice. We are not controlling the workings of our automated minds, and there are no solutions or options presented in front of us aside from what our minds direct us toward, that is, there wasn’t something else that we could have done, or that we could have picked instead. The world is too empty for us to be normal and internally generate our impulses, urges, desires, dreams, ambitions, and wishes based on what we really want and choose, not on what is inevitable because there isn’t anything else available in this meaningless world. This has changed since the twenty first century. Gradually maybe, but it kept increasing in the twentieth century until it has become what it is now since the beginning of the twenty first century. The act no longer made any sense. It is a total waste of time, life, energy, and effort. It has no meaning. It is against morality. It is wrong, bad, and unacceptable. It is no longer fun. It is degrading, it leads to degeneracy, stupidity, and ignorance. It leads to the lack of any kind of positive outcome, it leads to the absence of any sense or kind of achievement and accomplishment, and it defines what a total lack of purpose and meaning is. We want out of this game. Let us out. We didn’t consent to this gang bang. Please, let us just live in peace. When life has actually for the first time in history became worth living, anything that makes this impossible will lead to incredible or severe major depression, and hence the increased suicide rates. It is hopeless to survive among such people who keep attempting to harm and destroy you and everything that is in your life just because they enjoy this and you are so bad because you are not letting them have fun and feel good by watching you being destroyed and all that matters to you being destroyed. So you are the bad guy here, and they just get away with it, and law enforcement can’t help you here, and your shrink is telling you that you are delusional and paranoid, and your coach is telling you that you should toughen up, and not allow anyone to spoil your mood, and your emotions are under your control, and you won’t get angry unless you agree to become angry from their infuriating actions. Hopelessness is key to depression, and we seem to have plenty of keys at the moment. Life has become worth living now. It’s awesome, it’s epic. We don’t want to waste our lives trying to deal with evil people. We just want to live peacefully and live our lives to the fullest. When facing evil people and bad people, and when suffering because of evil people and bad people who are not considered by the law to be criminals yet, although they have the same minds of serial killers, mass murderers, and the worst of psychopaths, and they are at large, and they are present in huge numbers in this world, becomes inevitable, with no way out, there will be no hope of ever being happy, and consequently, major depression finds its way to you.

Download my Book The Genius Human, Book 1 in PDF format for Free

This is a link to my first book, which is the first book of the Genius Human book series.

Download my Free Ebook here

The Genius Human, Book 1

My response to Cosmic Skeptic’s Video Why Free Will Doesn’t Exist

You can induce desires. You can make yourself want to do something even if you before that didn’t want to do this thing. This is how you learn and this is how you make your ambitions higher. This is how you raise your standards, fix yourself, develop a greater ambition, and make decisions to no longer want to do stuff that brings you negative consequences or outcomes.

 

Why did Free Will suddenly become whether or not you got control over what you desire or love? You stated at the beginning of your ‘Why Free Will Doesn’t Exist’ video that it was concerning whether or not you could’ve done otherwise. What about inducing a desire or talking to yourself to want something that you don’t want, like in changing your desire? It is not impossible. You only cannot change whether or not something is good for you. But you can pick to not want to do what is good for you. This is what irresponsible people do all the time. It is not you are either forced to do something or you want to do it. If you were externally forced to do something, that is, you were pressured to do something by external factors and forces, then you didn’t have free will here. But if you forced yourself against what you would’ve naturally selected as your normal, default, or not pressured course of action, then that is the real power of decision making and willpower. This is not a case of absence of Free Will. You can also have control over your desires and what you really want. For example, the Jedi learning not to fall in love (which is always claimed to be something that occurs beyond your will or choice). The Jedi padawans are susceptible to fall in love all the time, but after enough training they develop the ability to not fall in love against their will or to not fall in love at all. They control their desires, urges, impulses, what they want, their emotions, and their feelings after they have trained enough to reach that level (when they are at least full Jedi). This is not the scientific definitive evidence for this fact, this is just an example for clarification of the idea to stimulate your imagination that the idea that it is possible through enough training to be able to control what you want and what you desire, and make your wants and desires totally under your control and subject to your own Free Will is not impossible to be true. This is also the basis of raising your standards and refining your ambition to direct it toward the epic quality of life that you are supposed to not settle for anything lesser than it. Or shaping yourself so that you start desiring and wanting a quality of life that is always increasing or not less than the best quality of life possible for you.

Free Will is not a hoax.

Those who claim that Free Will is an illusion are totally ignoring the power of decision making. If we have no free will, we wouldn’t have to make a decision about anything. Everything will just be occurring to us instead of we aim for them. To decide something, you are supposed to determine inside of you that this is what you will be doing. If there is no free will, actions will happen regardless of decision making. You will be just heading toward something with the decision about it already calculated and picked at the level of the unconscious without you forcing any action to be taken, and consciously you will be just observing you acting according to a decision that was already took unconsciously. This is not what happens in reality. There are times when you are forced to do something whether you like it or not for reasons that make it not up to you to pick whether to do such an action or not. For example you are extremely thirsty and finally you came across a glass of fairly cold water. You will witness your hand moving toward it and you drinking the water whether you like it or not, whether you determine that this is the right course of action for the next moment or not. This isn’t how all our lives are supposed to be. When there is no actual necessity to choose something, chances are, you will not exert any kind of effort unconsciously to make a decision about it. The decision about it will be almost entirely arbitrary. If you are hungry now, you will get ideas about what to eat and how to obtain it from a predetermined source unconsciously, but when you are full, you will be expected to exert an induced effort to even try to consider whether or not to lick some ice cream. Here you will say is it worth it? Am I too full? At least taste the thing. It is okay if you get some help from the unconscious mind. Like you are asking your unconscious mind to give you its opinion whether or not ‘we’ should proceed and grab the ice cream cone. But this doesn’t mean that you don’t have free will in here. You started it. You suggested that licking the ice cream at the moment is something that is debatable on your plate now. You might totally ignore or overlook the ice cream and not give a chance to your unconscious to even desire the ice cream now or later on. If you really had no free will, you will be forced to lick the ice cream whether you felt like it or not. There would be no way to resist the urge or impulse to eat ice cream. You wouldn’t be able to overlook it. Your body would be moving regardless of your consent. You won’t get a vote in this matter. This idea leads to apathy, and it is to be easily expected to find that the scientific experiments lead to the conclusion that the people tested are all lacking free will, when this is how they are living their real lives. They are reactive people, waiting for their unconscious mind to dictate its random urges and impulses on them and they just obey. They are really people lacking free will, and that is something that is becoming endemic. And that is not a discovery to be cherished, that is just sad. It is embarrassing that people find it out of their realm of control to have behaved differently in any given situation, and everything couldn’t have turned out with another outcome, regardless of what they do to make that happen. Believing just because our people have become passive and reactive instead of self-aware, strong, with a habit and an ability of planning ahead before taking any action, and proactive, that there is no such thing as Free Will is just giving up, and is just pathetic. People no longer sit down and say what do I want to do today. They just empty their urges and repressed impulses and unconsciously created desires as they come or arise in their minds and call this a life, and call this freedom while this is the epitome of slavery. This is a failure mentality, just like the passive mentality of destroying your thoughts by meditating on a regular basis, until you are transformed into a lifeless brain dead very skilled and capable drone, so that you start feeling happy, now, after you have destroyed your ability to detect what sucks and feel bad about it to the extent that you cannot settle for not fixing or changing what is standing between you and living the epic life that you are supposed to desire and aspire and have ambition to live it. It is not about being happy. It is about having accidentally run into realizing that intelligence grants you effects, results, and states that make a useless life actually worth living forever.

It is a common mistake to consider Christianity to be at least as bad as all other bad religions, until it was reformed

Christianity is the worst religion. Islam is not as bad as Christianity. This is a common mistake done by a lot of people because they compare the punishments for crimes found in Islam to that found in Christianity (For example the laws found in Deuteronomy and Leviticus). But the problem with Islam is bigger than just stoning gay people to death, or stoning to death adult married people who commit adultery, it is in the mind control, inhibition, restrains, and restrictions found in Islam. For example, the Hijab. It is like Islam rewires Muslims to derive pleasure, become elated, and become ecstatic from exercising mental inhibition, mental suppression, and mental repression almost all of the time. Islam contains numerous chains on the mind, the thinking, the behavior, and the practice of people that represses and suppresses Muslims all the time. For example, the concept of being always watched and monitored by God 24/7. If you think that something in Islam doesn’t make sense, if you disagree with or you disobey an order from God, if you attempt to disobey God in your mind without having taken any action, if you doubted anything that came from God, if you questioned your fate or destiny that is determined by God, or if you committed any of the countless thought Crimes of/in Islam, even as trivial as loving, trusting, and being loyal to someone who is Christian or just not Muslim, you are threatened to be expelled from Islam or you are risking being no longer considered a Muslim by God, and then you would become an ex-Muslim, an apostate, and not only you are supposed to be executed by other Muslims as commanded by God, but you are one of those who deserve the lowest (that is, the worst) place in Hell where you will be tortured and where you will suffer for eternity more than anywhere else in all God’s creation. This is not the case with Christianity, at least not anymore, because Christianity itself has changed through a period of around 500 years. But in case of Islam, these chains cannot be broken, because – unlike Christianity – no human assumed to have figured out or determined that these things are what God told us, how God treats us, or what is Islam’s stance on these questions. In the Islamic religion, from or according to the Divine texts of Islam, like the Quran itself, it is established beyond the shadow of a doubt or without any degree of uncertainty or probability that every single letter and word in the Quran is the exact actual words of God the one and only creator of the Universe. If you attempt to change that then you are replacing God’s inerrant all-knowing eternal words that are valid for all time with someone else’s words (some created entity) and give them the same power, authority, value, and regard in terms of how they describe what Islam really is and what Islam really states and dictates to Muslims. There is also the idea that you can only enjoy something when or because it is not forbidden in Islam. It is like you are given your share of enjoyment. Feel happy because of this, you slave. It is like you are given permission to get pleasure from something. The problem isn’t just with the huge quantity of stuff that is forbidden in Islam, that makes you unable to breathe from how hugely you feel you are restricted from moving. It is in the part that is not forbidden. It is in the humiliation, the pity. How pathetic your life becomes, that you are just enjoying something because you are allowed to, ordered to, or supposed to enjoy it within limits, because you are not here to feel good albeit live your life to the fullest, but you are here to please God and worship him. You are here temporarily as a passenger on a Journey to heaven. Why would you care about anything that you are just passing by through your journey or on your way to your intended main destination? You are supposed to derive pleasure from what you are dictated you are not forbidden to derive pleasure from, the way God expects and orders you, with the quantity and quality that God defines and describes, and at the time and place that God told you that you are allowed to enjoy yourself doing the non-forbidden stuff in it. Happy now? You are being monitored while trying to feel good, because this isn’t what you are in this life and world for, and then you will be expected to stop at a certain moment because more than this is or will be exceeding the permitted limits of the allowed pleasures and the non-forbidden stuff in Islam. Poverty of thoughts and poverty of the mind is sure to become a result of adopting such belief systems. The result of which is indefinite dissatisfaction with one’s own life, and believing and feeling that nothing really matters, then why not direct this negative energy toward destroying everything that is good in this world, in the Universe, or in this first life. You cannot expect to cultivate a mentality of violence in someone with an ideology that matches that resulting from believing and following the ideology of the Islamic Religion.

Why the Puddle analogy makes sense

One of the arguments Theists use to defend their claims of the necessity of the existence of a creator of the Universe is the fine Tuning argument. Everything is exactly as we need to be able to exist inside the universe. Everything and all conditions are perfectly adjusted to suit everything inside the universe in it and to suit the survival and growth of all living organisms on earth.

One of the absurdities of this argument is that God has made all this just to make life on earth possible. This in and of itself refutes the claim that God has made everything. Why would God go through all this just to produce such a result. Couldn’t God make a world that all living organisms on earth could survive in it without creating countless galaxies and all he created just to reach the same result? Theists might respond to that by stating that God wants to impress us with what he can do, with his powers and capabilities, so that we would believe in him. Well, if he really wants to convince us that he is omnipotent then he would show us that through stronger methods. Clearly he doesn’t want anyone to notice how powerful he really is or else he would have tried to demonstrate his powers, capabilities, and omnipotence to us in greater quantity and quality. He is not making anything that shows anyone that he is all powerful. Just stuff that was created long ago, and that’s it. He is not trying hard enough to show us his powers or omnipotence. So this makes the entirety of the universe and all that is in it except maybe our galaxy totally useless. Also, it means that God couldn’t have created a life sustaining planet without all that useless stuff, that is, he cannot create a planet like earth without having to create an entire useless universe in the process. So God is not doing a good job convincing us that he is all powerful, and the examples that he intended to convey this message to us (the message that he is omnipotent) through them work against proving this message to be true, that is, these examples further demonstrate how incapable he really is, or how he is not omnipotent.

Theists have a habit of walking down the street and pointing to something and saying see how great, complex, beautiful, and wonderful it is, therefore God (God created it, God is very Great, and God is powerful). It is ironic and embarrassing how a deeper look at the universe and everything that is in it leads to the conclusion of how God is not powerful at all or not powerful enough. That is, Not omnipotent.

The Universe is not fine tuned for us or for life on earth. We and all living organisms or all life on earth are fine tuned for the Universe. Notice that we are trying to develop technology all the time that would protect us from the harsh environment, just because it is not perfectly modified to suit us, to not harm us in any way, or to not make us suffer at all. If the universe was fine tuned for us we would be able to live in any kind of environment, at least somewhere or in some part of the environment, or at least in some kind of environment that exists on earth without any technology, without there being any degree of suffering to humans or to any living organism at all. This is not the case. It is so hard to survive on your own, with other people, or with a group of people in a harsh environment (without any kind of technology at all). This cannot be called a place that was made just for us or just to fit people like us. Also, countless other life forms suffer in that same environment that is best suited for them. On the other hand, there are countless extinct species that show how life was not so adapted, so adjusted, or so fine tuned to accommodate for them, to fit them, or to suit their survival and growth. That is aside from this meaning that God was just experimenting or entertaining himself with creating all those species to annihilate, exterminate, wipe out, or make them go extinct in the end, for no gain from that or for no benefit from that on how the environment would be perfect for the survival of all the current living species on earth.

The following is an exempt from an article made by Richard M. Smith as a review or response to a book called “Where the conflict really lies: Science, Religion and Naturalism” and this part of that article below refutes the fine tuning argument.

“Fine-tuning

Plantinga also invokes a ‘fine-tuning’ design argument, one which claims that the universe’s basic constants are so narrowly tailored to allow life that the only plausible explanation is divine design. But is all of that true? First, we don’t even know that the physical constants can be varied: they may be fixed to their values by more fundamental properties. Second, we don’t know that our universe is really that special. Universes with different fundamental constants could be unusual and interesting in different ways. Life could arise through different chemistries or under different physical laws. Physicist Victor Stenger modeled a wide range of possible constants, and many variations met a key prerequisite for life—star lifetimes long enough to generate high nuclear-weight elements.[10]

Third, there may be an overarching mechanism for producing many separate universes or regions with varying laws. Physicist Paul Davies says that “some version of a multiverse is reasonable given the current world view of physics.”[11] Plantinga strangely argues that even so, why our particular universe has life-friendly constants still requires explanation. But if you’re in a bridge tournament so large that it includes all possible deals, then it’s no longer unusual that some people are dealt amazing hands. Once you add to this that we could only be in universes that are life-friendly, no further explanation is needed.[12]

But let us grant for the sake of argument that there is only one universe, the constants can vary widely, and our universe is the only vaguely interesting outcome of those variations. Even so, a very unlikely outcome does not support the inference that our universe’s features are due to some nonrandom process like design.[13] If a large number of outcomes is possible and any one of them is unlikely, then maybe our particular unlikely event simply happened. Then again, maybe it wasn’t as unlikely as we think. Cosmologist Stephen Hawking writes: “[T]he present state of the universe could have arisen from quite a large number of different initial configurations…. [which] shows that the initial state of the part of the universe that we inhabit did not have to be chosen with great care.”[14] And how plausible is Plantinga’s preferred alternative—that an all-powerful, all-good, all-knowing, immaterial, immanent being simply existed from all time, no explanation necessary? For his part, after mounting a defense that does not address the key objections adequately, Plantinga nonetheless concludes that he can’t put much weight on the fine-tuning argument.” ~ Alvin Plantinga Can’t Say That, Can He?
A Review of Where the Conflict Really Lies (2016) by Richard M. Smith

 

People who change after marriage

Acceptance of people for who they are should be about their personality and character only, not about their physical appearance. You are attracted to a girl because you like what you see, she is physically beautiful and attractive. If you are looking for a personality only, then you are looking for a friendship. When you find someone with an amazing personality, character, and mind you regard him or her as an awesome friend, and not necessarily as someone you’d be in a romantic and sexual relationship with, unless they are physically attractive and sexy to you. This is why sexuality exists. There are bisexual people because they are turned on and want to have sex with both males and females. If wanting to have sex is not found, they would just be friends like heterosexual people. Bisexual people will not settle for only friendship or just a friendship if they find the person of the same sex hot or sexy (that is in case the other person is available and they are not in a relationship or they are in an open relationship). If sexual attractiveness doesn’t matter, bisexual people would regard all those of their same sex as friends only, and will not be turned on, be attracted to, or be sexually aroused by anyone of their same sex, regardless of how hot, sexy, beautiful, physically attractive, or sexually attractive these people of their same sex are. Romance is not about the mind, the personality, or the character of the other person. Appearance, beauty, and how you look like significantly matters and is a cornerstone or a core part in what this relationship is based upon or what this relationship is about in the first place. It is not that the mind is the main thing and the body or the looks are the complementary factors or things in the sexual or romantic relationship, it is that the looks and the sexual attractiveness of the body of the other person is the main thing or factor upon which the sexual or romantic relationship is based upon and the mind, personality, and character are the complementary or additional factors or things that the sexual or romantic relationship is based upon or are the things and factors that make the sexual or romantic relationship stronger and more desired. Physical attractiveness is key and is core to any romantic and sexual relationship. If physical attractiveness disappears, there would no longer be a reason for the relationship to stay romantic and sexual. It would transfer to only a friendship or some kind of life partnership. It is surprising to find an lot of people missing that and believing that the one they are with in a long-term romantic and sexual relationship should love them only because of their personality, character, mind and how special and unique they are, regardless of their physical appearance or how attractive or sexy they are or at least how potentially attractive and sexy they are (that is, if they are not prepared now to look good, but if they take care of that in a few minutes they would look beautiful, like a woman who has just gotten out of bed in the morning, not looking very pretty, but after shit, shower, and breakfast, and maybe some makeup, she looks gorgeous. This is totally okay, and this is not the issue here. What cannot be fixed in the same day issues that make someone less physically and sexually attractive are what I am discussing at the moment. Like for example the lack of physical exercise or over eating that might lead to someone’s sexual or physical attractiveness decreasing after several years or several months of marriage. One of the issues that come with marriage is that there is some kind of psychological settling and comfort that arises from the lack of necessity to stay being able to attract anyone of the opposite sex (or the desired sex) because you are already stuck with one who would settle for whatever you become because they got no choice but to accept and make do with you regardless of how you look like or what you become like, and it will not be something easy to end this relationship, simply because you cannot end marriages too often or else the next marriage partner won’t take you seriously, and won’t believe you when you promise long term commitment. It will be like the boy who cried wolf. Many people say that if you love me you should accept me for who I am regardless of how I look, my body weight, my lack of physical fitness, my poor hygiene, my hair being messy, my appearance looking generally scary or repellent, or my appearance is generally turning anybody else off. Accepting someone for who they are should be concerning the mind only. The Character. The personality. What is inside this person. But for someone to keep loving his romantic or sexual partner or spouse, there should be a minimum standard or a minimum requirement of some beauty, physical attractiveness, or sexual attractiveness. The appearance should match (at least to a certain extent) how attractive and great the loved one’s mind, personality, and character are.